Dimensions are width 48"/69"/58", length 90", and total packed weight is about 7 pounds.
Photos here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/10534438@N06/sets/72157642132678413/
$175 plus shipping
Your username and password for these discussion forums are unique to the forums. Your forum login information is separate from your My Adventure Cycling login information, and your login info for the Cyclosource online store. You will need to create a separate login for each of these. However, to make things a bit easier, you can use the same email and password for all three accounts. Also, please note that your login information for the forums is not connected to your Adventure Cycling membership number. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
We have blocked registrations from several countries because of the large quantities of spam that originate there. If the forum denies your legitimate registration, please ask our administrator for an exception. firstname.lastname@example.org will need your IP address, which you can find at many web sites, including http://whatismyipaddress.com.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
FWIW. The fact that it has hollow tubing rather than solid rod is a good thing in my opinion. Assuming the same alloy, tubing has most of the stiffness at a reduced weight Solid rod is actually a sign of a lesser made rack.I would agree only if the tubing is larger diameter to compensate. How much larger it would need to be, I don't know. Maybe that's why the struts are now 11mm, though the website says 9mm. Perhaps the 9mm on the website is dated.
Now if it has worse welds or a lesser alloy that is another matter.The weld in the back doesn't go as far across on the new rack. Can't speak to the quality of the welds or the alloy.
A little off topic... Is southern portion of SC passable in mid March? I am looking at, say from where it intersects Southern Tier, to where it gets close to LA, near San Bernadino or Burbank.
There is little to no chance of snow accumulation on the part of the route you describe. But I wouldn't characterize the scenery as particularly great either.
If you ride Route 66 in California, the stretch between Newberry Springs and Ludlow (66 is a kind of frontage road to I40 along here), you'll find the worst pavement on 66. This is pavement from hell. It's the anti-pavement. I rode it once and vowed never again. Twice, once going east and once west, I've scoffed at the no-bikes on I40 in this area and jumped on the interstate--aaaah! Smooth, wide, fast shoulders, moderate to light traffic. Very pleasant. No cops bothered me, but you only need to get on I40 for about 25 miles to dodge the worst of the 66 junk surface. After that, in either direction, the riding is pretty good. The stretch from Ludlow down into the sink around Amboy is grade-A classic desert riding.Ah, now that this thread is alive again, I just noticed this. Once I tried to ride 66 west out of Ludlow and noticed the same thing. I ended up entering I-40 at the next onramp and it all the way to Newberry Springs. http://www.bikingbrian.com/2010/03/18/route-66-bicycle-tour-day-5/
Never said anything like that to me