Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zzzz

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
Routes / Re: Southern Tier, highway 78 Glamis to Palo Verde, Ca
« on: November 20, 2014, 11:45:00 am »
The poster Westinghouse has laid out quite the scenario here for bicycle harassment.

And he has doubled and tripled down on it in his postings now so I'm sure these are deeply held beliefs.

And I have never ridden the Southern Tier route.

And over the 40 years and 100,000+ mile I have ridden a bike I have run into my fair share of drivers of every stripe that were clueless or malevolent and what I am about to say in no way exonerates drivers who put a cyclist's life in danger because they are clueless or stupid or psychotic.

Having qualified all of that, What he has described here does not remotely pass the sniff test.

The claim that over a course of 5 states and 2000± miles there is a cabal that lies in wait (I can only presume for hours) for passing cyclists, while in coordination with another driver coming in the other direction, just so they can pass said cyclist simultaneously on a bridge or some other tight spot for some mysterious motivation is simply not feasible. If for no other reason then the majority of truck drivers are paid by the mile they are not going to sit by the roadside in wait for a rider just to get there jollies(do they throw camouflage netting over their trucks so you won't recognize what is going on when you ride by?).

Everyone is entitled to believe what they want and I'm quite sure Westinghouse will continue believing very strongly that this is happening. But I am writing this for anyone who has not spent much time on the road and wants to know if it's safe out there. You will always be somewhat more vulnerable on a bike than in a car. But the take away I have had and you hear again and again and again from people when the come off a tour is that these long rides reinforce a belief that the vast majority of people are decent and  you will run into a number of people whose kindness will stay with you forever.

Pete

2
General Discussion / Re: Useless advice/help
« on: November 14, 2014, 10:14:16 am »
I was going west to east on the Western Express route. I got to Cedar City, Ut and took my bike to the bike shop in town to have it thoroughly cleaned up. As it was being worked on another customer came in and we were talking. He was a local and had apparently done a lot riding thru-out Utah. He asks about my route and I show him the ACA map.

For anyone not familiar w that area there's a pretty stout climb right out of Cedar City that tops out above 10,000' and on paper it looks kind of intimidating. At the top is something called Cedar Breaks. So this guy is going on and on that he wouldn't climb all the way to the top, he would turn at this intersection before the top and head straight to the next town. Nothing that terrific to see at Cedar Breaks.

So the next morning I start the climb up the hill. I'm thinking from what the guy said that the climb was going to be a total beat down and when I get to this early intersection I'll make up my mind then if I'm going to take his short cut. The climb turns out to be perfect. It was substantial but never so steep that you couldn't keep your rhythm the whole way up. And I keep looking for this intersection for the short cut, 8000', 8500', 9000', finally at around 9500' I see the turn off. I'm thinking to myself "Really?!, I'm going off-route to save 700' of climbing?! I don't think so!".

The icing on the cake was that the view of Cedar Breaks was easily within the top 5 things I saw on that trip.

pm

3
General Discussion / Re: Touring Bicycle
« on: November 03, 2014, 02:54:25 pm »
Uh,oh... somebody's calling out cyclists for "grade inflation". There's always someone who brings a ruler & scale to the fishing camp!

I've ridden a bunch of these of these big Rockies' passes also and they always seem to be 2800-3500' of elevation change @ 8-11 miles for a average grade of 5-7%. And actually the 20% grade on the short stuff doesn't pass the math test either, at least for anything longer than 50± yards anyplace I've been in the Appalachian's.

But never mind the hyperbole, it's still a good idea to check yourself against what you're likely to run into before you make any assumptions about what you need for a low gear before you leave.

Also, these threads can wander but note that the OP started it by stating his ambitions, which specifically precluded any big mountain crossings.

pm

4
Routes / Route from Southern Idaho to Cedar City,Ut
« on: November 01, 2014, 11:10:44 pm »
Hi All:

I'm looking to put together my trip for next year. I have the month of September and based on previous experience I figure 2500± miles. The final 550 miles of the trip will be ACA's Grand Canyon route.

After pouring over some road maps I'm figuring on starting in Spokane, go east for a few miles into Idaho and pick up 95 going south into 55 into Boise. There I'll pick up 21 into 75 and go see Craters of the Moon NP.

How best to get from there to Cedar City, Ut. is my question.

I'm trying to figure out if it would be better to make my way over to Flaming Gorge and then cut diagonally across the state to Cedar City or if I can piece together a straighter north to south route that manages to skip the traffic/congestion of the Logan/SLC/Provo metroplex that still has plenty of attractive scenery.

I've done the Western Express before and while I wouldn't consider riding those same roads again a hardship I would prefer something new.

Right now I am completely open to suggestions, so if you feel there's must see stuff that falls somewhere between Spokane and Phoenix, please mention it.

Thanks,

Pete

5
Routes / Re: Sierra Cascades; desert heat in July
« on: October 26, 2014, 12:27:23 pm »
I just rode most of this route (Canadian border to LA) this last 8/30 - 9/28.

I can't speak to your original question about the heat & water because I think you were referring to the last 250 miles that I missed and because I was fortunate enough to encounter a rare late September cold snap when I came thru SoCal, mornings in the high 40's & highs of 65°±. Although I will say (particulerly in SoCal) there were several stores marked on the map that were closed, do not put yourself in a situation where your well being counts on the next place on the map being there.

But I would like to address a couple of other things. You say this is your first major trip, I have no interest in dissuading you from this route but it is a tough one. All the climbing can feel pretty relentless after awhile and the pavement on a lot of the descents is crap which can make them pretty intimidating. Actually, a lot of the pavement is crap period but it's scarier at 40 mph than it is at 7 mph. Which is to say I hope your competence as a cyclist is very high and your fitness level is high.

The other thing I will bring up, since it sounds like you have some flexibility, is to leave in the spring from the south. As I'm sure you're aware California has been going through a record drought for years now. As you go through it the entire state feels like a tinder box. Short of a very wet winter and spring this year it's likely to still be ready to burn next year. And September is prime forrest fire season. This year for much of August the "Hat Creek" fire was burning, when you go down 89 north of Lassen you will be riding along it's path for miles. In late August and early September there was a big fire just south of Yosemite. There was the huge "King" fire right when I was coming through Tahoe in mid September. You get the idea. I have perhaps never been so lucky in my life as to the way I threaded the needle on missing the effects of these fires. I had some smoke in the afternoon in Sierraville north of Truckee and some smoke in Yosemite when I dropped down into the valley. In both cases in the morning it was gone. You should not count on being so fortunate.

If you can leave in the spring from the south, keep an eye on the snow pack in the southern Sierra's over the winter, I would think Ca DOT has a web site listing when the passes are open and I would leave in mid April if you can. The rivers and creeks will be charged, the waterfalls in Yosemite will be flowing and you'll beat (at least some) of the crowds there and by the time you get north it will have warmed up.

Good Luck,

Pete




6
General Discussion / Re: Touring Bicycle
« on: October 25, 2014, 10:04:45 pm »
If "ozroller" is evaluating himself accurately as a strong climber and he's packing light he should be fine w a 30x30 (27" gear) and certainly w a 30x34 (23.8"). Just make sure you take a drive over to Colorado and test how it all feels with accurate weight in your panniers before you leave on a long trip. Loveland Pass should tell you everything you need to know. Or since Kansas is a big state you can go the other way and spend a couple days going up & down in the Ozarks. Be very honest w yourself after your test, pulling too high a gear can lead to issues w your knees.

I fancy myself a pretty good climber and I pack light and I just take my regular road bike. My low gear is 34x28 and it's served me well and I've gone up plenty of long and steep stuff (SC, all of the GPN & 1/2 of the GPS, WE, & the TA between Missoula & Co. and then again east of the high plains to the Va. coast).

Pete

7
This can also be over analyzed.

To the OP:

A lot of issues with fit don't come up until you spend a fair amount of time on the bike, you're on a tour, or you're riding more than 100 miles a week. Or when you've gotten old and creaky.

Are you still young and spry, say under 30? I started w a hand-me-down bike that was 2cm shy of my ideal size when I was a teen and raced & rode it for several years w/o incident for 1000's of miles a year. Even now, if we have visitors who ride, I will give them my bike and I will take my wife's, which is also 2 cm short for me, raise the seat and go and it is never a problem, even on a 100 mile ride.

You've gotten different advice here and it may be correct for you. But FWIW here's my opinion.

You said there were a few 58's to choose from. Go ride them and see which one feels best and buy it. If you have a pal you can take along and knows enough to be of help evaluating the bikes and getting your seat height right, take them with you. Proper leg extension is very important. If you're feeling cramped in the arms and shoulders, get a longer stem. Then go ride it for a year or two (or more) until you have some experience to draw on and you know what you want.

Unlike a frame thats too big for you, there are riders that actually prefer a frame size thats technically a little small. Also, really tall frames can start to have some handling issues.

Maybe you'll love riding, and if you do you'll want to step up the quality in your next bike anyway. At that time you can worry about things like crank length and frame geometry and really dial in the details to get a bike that's your ideal set-up. If it turns out that ridings not for you then your investment in tight times didn't brake the bank.

Pete

8
General Discussion / Re: Knees.... not the bees knees...
« on: October 14, 2014, 11:04:05 pm »
The way I read the original post was that she started the ride w/ cleats and then stopped using them when her knees started to hurt. Although if she was clipped in that would certainly narrow the possibilities as a maladjusted cleat is more likely to put your knee in a bad way than the seat height being off.

Not to make this a chorus but the advice to see a doc is spot on. If you're on a 2 or even 4 week trip and somethings hurts and you decide to bull through it, that's one thing. You're on a 10,000 mile trip, that's completely different. That's a bad sign that you were off the bike for 6 weeks working and the first day back riding your knee was hurting.

The other point I'll make is just how subtle these things can be. I was having some small amount of foot pain shortly before I left for my trip in September (also in the Sierras). I went to a podiatrist and he thought it was too close to my leaving to do anything permanent to my insoles so he put a little piece of adhesive foam, maybe an 1/8" thick under my insole where he thought it would help. I went riding and it felt good. A week into my ride my knee started hurting in a way it had never hurt before. The only thing I knew that was different was that 1/8" thick foam. Pulled it out and the pain went away within a couple of hours. If you make a change to your position, ride with it for a little bit unless the pain is getting specifically worse. Be very cognisant of changes that made things slightly better (or worse) and slowly dial it in.

I'm sure this is very frustrating for you. Good luck getting it right.

Pete

9
Hi:

I flew back home to the east coast today after spending September riding the SC from north to south. In the end I got 2200 of 2388 miles done but I needed to get back to work on 10/1. I can confirm that it's a difficult route.

I do have my opinions about both the SC and your proposed alternative as I've ridden much of that as well but the big question in my mind is whether your new touring partner is new to cycling or just new to touring? If she's new, or even newish, to cycling than the route is simply too difficult. If she's been riding for awhile and is a capable rider than you have a choice to make.

If you're still considering the SC, let me know and I'll write out my thoughts on the route while they're still fresh. I believe with your more open timetable there are ways to make the route less intimidating.

Pete

10
General Discussion / Re: Riding on the US Interstates
« on: August 27, 2014, 05:13:56 pm »
You are right. I missed your point. I thought you were saying that it's safer to ride on the interstate as opposed to the idea it should be a choice. Since I wouldn't do it I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other.

And you're also right about the RV's. The 2 really close encounters I've had on tours have both been RV's. Small sample size but that's still 100%.

But do you really want to stand by the statement that in 4 continental crossings you've never once had a truck slow down when overtaking you? Riding a bike exposes you to a certain amount of danger that you would not face in a car, as your fellow Aussie's recent death all to clearly illustrates, but let's not make it out to be worse than it is.

I'm going to make up some numbers here but they represent what it feels like to me out on the road after 40 years and well over 100k miles on a bike. Probably 40% of the time I'm passed and there's a bad sight line or oncoming traffic ahead the car eases off the gas 50-100 yards behind me to assess the situation for a safe pass (AKA: the proper way to pass a cyclist). Then there's another 50% who stay on the gas till they're quite close and then hit their brakes hard when they realize they can't see around you or somebody's coming the other way (AKA: the stupid way to pass a cyclist). Now that still leaves a 10%± group of drivers that stay on the gas despite the fact they can't see what's coming the other way or there's not enough room because of car traffic ahead (AKA: the should be considered criminally negligent way to pass a cyclist) and that's plenty bad enough.

Pete


11
General Discussion / Re: Riding on the US Interstates
« on: August 27, 2014, 07:29:50 am »
I have to agree w/ the 2 previous posters, I don't believe interstate highway access is the answer. There are too many people hit every year on the shoulder of the road when they've stopped their cars for repairs for me to think that this is a safe place to be.

I would like to see two changes to improve rider safety in this country:

1) I think people should have to undergo a driving test every time they renew their driver's license. And it should be difficult to pass. This can be done in a driving simulator (which can be very sophisticated these days) and it should include a number of scenario's involving pedestrians and cyclists. I'm sure all of us see behavior from cars on a regular basis that is shocking in it's ignorance considering the driver is piloting equipment that is so easily lethal.

2) There should be real consequences to hitting someone with your car. If the driver is at fault in a serious accident their license should be pulled for a long time and except for their work time they should be under house arrest for a long time as well. They've KILLED or SERIOUSLY MAIMED someone. There should be dramatic consequenses for that, not dismissed as "no criminality intended". Right now, if your not drunk, and it's not a hit and run, and in some jurisdictions if you're not texting, you get a free pass for killing cyclists and pedestrians.

Now, the guy who hit this poor women was reported as drunk and it was a hit and run so everything he did was already illegal as well as immoral. And you go thru life and see bad stuff happen to good people who deserved a better fate. It's cold comfort but hopefully justice will be served and 1 more a--hole will be off the road. And the rest of us left will carry on just a little more sober in the knowledge that what time you have here is precious.

Pete

12
From the outside or inside?

13
General Discussion / Re: Busiest ACA or other trail intersection?
« on: August 25, 2014, 10:07:13 am »
These folks are a commercial enterprise which you indicate you may, or may not, be what you eventually want to shoot for but they are similar to what you described. You may want to talk w/ them:

http://www.whitefishbikeretreat.com/other-services/

As for location, have you thought about someplace w easy on/off access to the GDMR ?

Pete


14
General Discussion / Re: Help me decide on this last minute tour.
« on: August 25, 2014, 04:47:30 am »
I'm not going to try to talk you out of Colorado, it's a beautiful state w lots to see. But if you want to see Glacier at some point in your life I think early September is the best time to ride GTSR, at least from my experience.

I rode it last year on Sept. 6 and started at 7 am on the east (less spectacular) side. Traffic was almost non-existent. There was 3, maybe 4 small patches of construction and that actually worked in my favor. A couple times as a cyclist they just waved me thru and where I was stopped for a couple of minutes the few cars that were there passed me right away before I even had much of a chance to get rolling. I don't think I got passed by 20 cars on the entire ascent. I did stop several times on the way down the west side to soak up the views but while I was rolling I don't remember getting passed by anyone on the steep part. By the time the road was starting to flatten out at the bottom I could see traffic was starting to build going up, I think it was probably around 10 by then.

Compare that to the nose to tail traffic jam that any video you pull up on you-tube for GTSR has and it felt like I had the road all to myself.

Pete

15
General Discussion / Looking for Bike Shop in LA
« on: August 23, 2014, 09:49:54 pm »
Hello All:

I start the Sierra Cascades route in Bellingham on 8/30. On 9/30 I have a plane ticket from LAX back home. I'll need to drop my bike off at a shop in the LA area for them to ship it back (I got a hardshell box, it doesn't come with me on the plane).

I'm sure there are 100's of bike shops in the LA area that I could look up on the web but I'd like a recommendation from someone who knows the business who can speak directly to the fact that they did a really careful job packing your bike. And if they are located within 10-15 miles of LAX, so much the better.

Thanks,

Pete

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6