Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - TokyoNose

Pages: [1] 2
Routes / Re: Yellowstone Camping
« on: June 17, 2014, 11:32:59 pm »
Madison, about 15-20 miles east of the West Yellowstone entrance (can't remember- sorry!), will not turn you away, at least as of last year when I passed through the park in early June. This was according to the park personnel administering the campground. It is along the Trans Am route, if that is the route that you will be taking. Grant Village is also along the route, but it was not open when I passed through, so I cannot answer for that. Also, Colter Bay in the Tetons has a cyclist/hiker-only area, so you will have a spot there if you need it. Between the two is the Flagg Ranch on the Rockefeller Parkway. Probably no guarantee of a spot, but my guess is that the crew there would do what they could to fit you in.

Gear Talk / Re: Cateye time & average speed funky readings
« on: April 17, 2014, 10:56:37 pm »
Unlikely to solve this, but just for laughs, make sure that magnet is passing close enough to the sensor to register each revolution of the wheel.

Gear Talk / Re: Which triple crankset will fit my bike?
« on: January 06, 2014, 01:36:48 pm »
Yes, swapping out the crankset is indeed your next step.  Apart from that, you could swap the cassette to a Shimano 9sp HG-61 11-36t, but non-Shadow-type Shimano rear derailleurs sometimes require B-screw modifications to clear the 36t cog.

I understand the temptation to run the 22-32-44 mountain crankset.  It definitely offers the low gear ratios that are desirable on a loaded touring bike (I am assuming that this is the issue which you are trying to address).  Unfortunately, Shimano mountain/road component incompatibility bugs could turn a seemingly simple solution down a dead-end path.

The suggested Sugino crankset is, new, quite reasonably priced, at least as cranksets go, and the Shimano bottom bracket is not a terribly expensive piece of kit either.  You might have some luck snooping around on eBay (beware of worn chainrings, the replacement of which could cost you a large percentage of the cost of a brand-new crankset), and there are any number of online retailers and local bike shops from which you can source the Sugino crankset.  Rivendell sells them for $146, and offers them in 4 different arm lengths, which is nice if you are picky about that sort of thing (I am).

FWIW, I am running a Sugino Alpina 2 (24-36-48) crankset with a Shimano Ultegra triple FD (10speed) and 105 brifters, and the front shifting is as good or better than that on any bike that I have ever owned.  YMMV, but it is at least worth taking a shot at running your current Ultegra FD with the Sugino.

Good luck!

Gear Talk / Re: Which triple crankset will fit my bike?
« on: January 06, 2014, 11:45:42 am »
Brifters? No, unfortunately, brifters will not shift a mountain front derailleur.  The levers will not pull enough cable to actuate the front derailleur across all three of the rings. 

I like the idea proposed by waynemyer and DaveB: a Sugino triple.  Something like an XD2/XD600 is available with 24/36/48 or 24/36/46 rings, is 9 speed compatible, and will run on a Shimano UN54 or UN55 bottom bracket.  It might even shift with your current front derailleur.  If not, a Tiagra triple front derailleur, which is more tolerant of smaller rings than the Ultegra, should get the job done.

If you still need lower gearing, your next stop will be the cassette.  A larger range cassette might, however, require a longer cage derailleur.  Something like a 9 speed Deore will probably work just fine and will play nicely with your brifter (same cable-pull ratio).  Shimano rear mechs typically come in three flavors: short cage (road), GS (medium length cage), and SGS (long cage).  If you have the choice, get the long cage.  It will weigh just a bit more and require a very slightly longer chain, but will leave you the flexibility to run just about any gearing that you desire.  In any case, stay clear of 10 speed DynaSys rear derailleurs.  They use a different cable-pull ratio than 9 speed rear derailleurs and will not work with your brifters.

Sorry to take you yet another level down into the rabbit hole.  Changing gearing sometimes opens Shimano's Box; altering one part of the system often leads to a seemingly endless chain of modifications necessary to make the whole mess work properly.  Having a good LBS with whom you can work is a great asset, as, for instance, they might be able to experiment with different spindle length bottom brackets at no extra charge to you (although you will probably end up with either a 110 or 113mm spindle) in order to ensure that your drivetrain is set up with the proper chainline.

Gear Talk / Re: Which triple crankset will fit my bike?
« on: January 05, 2014, 11:03:04 pm »
Be aware that you might also have to swap out your front derailleur to accommodate a different crankset.  This is especially likely if you switch to a 44-32-22 mountain triple.  It is also possible, but unlikely, that to shift into a small ring such as the 22 tooth inner ring on a mountain triple, the derailleur will swing low enough to make contact with the chainstay.

Gear Talk / Re: Why are most of the tires wire bead?
« on: December 02, 2013, 12:36:56 pm »
Three other tires that have not been mentioned and are worth considering:

Panaracer Pasela TG
Panaracer (Pasela) T-Serve
Vittoria Voyager Hyper (formerly known as the Randonneur Hyper)

The Vittorias might be outside of your budget window and are more difficult to find than the Panaracers.  I would also hesitate to use any of these tires for a heavily-loaded, multi-week tour, as the sidewalls and tread compound are probably not as durable as some of the more heavy-duty offerings from Schwalbe and Continental.  For a shorter, less remote tour on a bike not loaded with the gear required to get you across the continent and beyond, though, they would, IMHO, be the preferred option.  They will have less rotational inertia, roll slightly faster, and offer a more comfortable ride.

FWIW, here is a thought based upon my experience:  I doubt that I could tell much of a difference between a $50 and a $100 derailleur, but between a $25 and a $50 tire?  Almost certainly.  It is really worth spending the money to get the tires best suited to your needs. 

Gear Talk / Re: Trek 520 poor brakes
« on: November 11, 2013, 10:03:25 pm »
Please don't be insulted by the simplicity of this question, but...

Are you sure that the brake levers are compatible with linear pull (V-type) brakes?  You mentioned that the levers are the originals that came with the bike.  Was the bike originally equipped with cantilever brakes?  Most road-style levers will not pull enough cable to effectively actuate a linear pull brake.

Routes / Re: NYC to Monticello NY Route
« on: October 12, 2013, 10:58:39 am »
Have you tried searching Map My Ride or Ride With GPS?  Perhaps someone has done the ride and left behind a well thought-out route. 

Routes / Re: Advice for a ride beginning in NYC
« on: April 28, 2013, 02:43:16 pm »
If you are traveling light and willing to put in some longish days, you should have no trouble doing the loop in 4 days, especially if you are beginning and ending the ride in Saratoga Springs without the tag end leading to/from Niskayuna.

[Spoiler Alert]  I did the ride with two small rear panniers and a handlebar bag, which I would call modestly loaded.  My shortest gear was 34x27, pushing a 700x32 tire, which works out to something like 35ish gear inches.  I would consider myself an average-strength rider, and although I wouldn't have minded having a bit lower gearing, I was OK, with one exception: a short hill somewhere past Lake Luzerne (I think) which for about 100 meters nearly had me off the bike, pushing.  Even standing up, I just couldn't make it go ;D.  The three big climbs- Graphite Mountain Road into Hague, Keene Valley to Lake Placid, and Whiteface mountain- from Wilmington to the crest- were no problem.  Long and challenging, but never so steep that I ever felt that I would have to abandon the saddle.

You should check to make sure of this, but if I am not mistaken, the Whiteface Mountain alternate avoids the climb up Whiteface mountain, which you most definitely want to do!

If it helps to break the ride into more manageable portions, there is a place called the Nick Stoner Inn near Caroga Lake.  My guess is that you will have the park and your hotels/inns to yourself, and I think that the time of the year which you have chosen is perfect.

You're going to have a great time!

Routes / Re: Advice for a ride beginning in NYC
« on: April 28, 2013, 07:38:23 am »
I'll be heading off on my own trip in a couple of days and will not have access to a computer.  If you have any questions, ask away and I will do my best to answer them before I set off.

It's a great ride.  Go for it!

mdxix, thanks again for all of your help!

The routes have been stripped of all waypoints, corrected in BaseCamp, and loaded into the etrex.  The Points of Interest have been loaded separately, and all seemed to fit with just a bit of memory to spare.  All that is left is to try it on the road.

I could never have done this without your guidance and patience.

Thank you,


Routes / Re: Advice for a ride beginning in NYC
« on: April 26, 2013, 07:29:02 am »
If you are really ambitious, you might just be able to squeeze in the ACA Adirondack Park loop.  You would have to take the Amtrak Lake Shore Shore Limited out of NY Penn Station to Schenectady and begin the ride from there (the ride "officially" begins in Niskayuna).  The train arrives in Schenectady at night, so your first night would be in a Schenectady hotel/motel.  The train departs Schenectady for NY Penn in the afternoon, so you could get an early start on your last day and catch the train back to the city that same day.  Again, it would take some clever planning to pull this off, but it would be a great little adventure if you could make it happen.  I did the semi-loaded CC version of this ride in 5 days/4 nights without feeling like I was overdoing it.

If this doesn't work, check out the website Riding the Catskills.

The author of the website has put together a collection of rides that are designed to run with Ride With GPS.  They are day rides, but a number of them are accessible from NYC Grand Central Station using Metro North.  Even if you are not interested in the day rides, you might be able to string together a short CC tour using some of his routing suggestions.

dkoloko also mentioned the Finger Lakes.  The couple of people with whom I have spoken about riding in that area have told me that it is beautiful, and I would guess that accommodations would not be difficult to find, offering you some flexibility in planning out the ride.

Best of luck!

Can you try simulation now? How does it work?

I loaded the file you had generated in BaseCamp directly from the GPX folder, bypassing BaseCamp.  It ran for a few miles, went into infinite-loop-at-the-interchange mode, and then crashed the GPSR.  I had to pull the batteries out of the unit to reset it.  I wasn't brave enough to try the Ride With GPS file  :-\.  I guess that my etrex just doesn't like simulations!  I was, though, able to create a route in BaseCamp, play the route in BaseCamp, transfer it to the etrex, and ride it.  It generated turn-by-turn instructions for the final 1/3 of the ride; up to that point it tracked my location and picked up the routepoints along the way but without instructions.  I stopped at least a half-dozen times and recalculated the route on road and also changed the "routing" settings in the etrex.  Some combination of these steps seemed to kick it into Useful Information Mode.  I only wish that I could remember exactly what they were, as I was not terribly scientific about it!  EDIT [I looked through the turn-by-turn instructions for the route in BaseCamp, and it appears that all was correct.  My confusion stemmed from the fact that the rural roads I was using change names, and what I thought should be labeled a turn was not, in fact, a turn.  I will set up another route today with a couple of dozen obvious turns and see how this plays out.  I think that it should work.]

I am currently in Northern Virginia, my staging area for the ride.  I am otherwise in New York City, and it is very difficult to try to route myself in BaseCamp and run a test while I am there, as City Navigator does not seem to recognize the special routing necessary, for instance, for a bicycle to cross the Manhattan Bridge (although that could very well be attributed to operator error).  Nor do I have a car, so that mode of on-the-road testing has also been unavailable to me.  I only mention this to let you know that I would love to have had much more practical experience with the etrex, and that I appreciate your patience in trying to make this all workable and useful for a newbie.

In the days ahead, I will be dedicating many hours to route modification, and you have certainly given me all of the tools to make this work.  I'll know whether the etrex, with my stripped and modified routes, will do the job after just the first few miles of the trip.  If it gets a headache at the first interchange, as it does in simulation mode (the folks at Garmin are convinced that it will not have issues when I am on the road), I will know what to look out for, and can reference the paper maps for confirmation of the correct route.  Beyond this, I need only to sort through the other waypoint data and cram in into the etrex.  How difficult could that be ;D???

My most sincere thanks,


This is strange. You mean that the route does not show following the road? Are you sure that you have loaded the City Navigator map onto your GPS? Remember that you need to transfer the maps from your computer to the GPS using Map Install.

Is it still giving you trouble?

Try using the files that I created just to be sure (all files will be there temporarily for 2–3 months after this post):

    Use this file that I created using BaseCamp. Does it behave the same?
    How about using the one I created using Ride with GPS?

It follows the road in BaseCamp when I run my modified route as well as both of the routes that you have modified.  The trouble begins when I load them onto the etrex.  The simulation of both of our BaseCamp-modified routes has a tantrum at the interchange between Colonial Parkway and Sanda Avenue, which corresponds roughly with routepoint J0CA551.  Instead of following Colonial Parkway as it has been told to, it tries, apparently, to take one of the intersecting ramps that lead to Sanda Avenue, and goes back and forth a couple of hundred feet... forever.  I am unable to run a simulation of the Ride With GPS route, as BaseCamp recognizes it as a track and not a route.  It will load onto the etrex, but I cannot run a simulation. 

I am running the latest version of City Navigator, both in BaseCamp and in the etrex, and I have the map enabled in the etrex.  I'm guessing that this is the odd-ish behavior that even the folks at Garmin couldn't explain.  I'm left to conclude that the GPSR just calculates routes differently (or at least the etrex 30 seems to).  I'm going to have to take their word that this won't be a major issue when I am on the road, do my best to make the routes as accurate and stable as possible in BaseCamp before transferring them to the etrex, and then hope for the best!  All of your help has already taken me so far that I'm really not too worried about it.  I will have the paper maps in front of me as I navigate, so if I have any doubts I will have the most accurate available reference to use for comparison.

Once you have the routes on your Mac, drag & drop onto BaseCamp. In BaseCamp, create a new list and put all of them in it. That will make it easiest to export them.

Great!  I'm on the right track here!  I will try to come up with some clever lettering system so that the sequence of the routes is obvious regardless of how it is displayed in the GPSR.  This is a good idea, no?

Put all the waypoints that you want to use in a new list under My Collection. From there, export that list into a GPX file and copy it to the unit. Or transfer it directly from BaseCamp to the unit.

With the stripped routes in the GPSR, I might have enough space for all of the Points of Interest!  I don't know if you can answer this, but when I look through the data as it lists in the window beneath the pane called "Trans Am", I first see a bunch of green gas station icons, followed by what look to be restaurant icons, followed by what appear to be routepoints or waypoints (when I double click on them, they take me to an intersection on the map).  Can I safely delete these, as well as all of the routes which appear at the bottom of the scroll?  We have made this information redundant, correct?

I'm soooo close!  All that is left to do now is the actual work of pounding each route into shape ;).

Again, thank you, mdxix!

mdxix, I'm closing in!

I have text edited each of the 12 TA folders and saved them to "My Collection" as "TA Stripped".  I went through J0CE90, beat it into conformity,  and then exported it as "Mod J0CE90 1.GPX".  When I open this file in BaseCamp, it displays the route correctly, but...

...there is a nasty little issue that I will have to work around, apparently, and it is this:  when I transfer the "Mod" file into the GPSR and run it in demo mode, it shows the straight-line, point-to-point route correctly.  When I recalculate the route and run the GPSR in simulation mode, it becomes confused at an interchange along the route and truncates the route.  My friends at Garmin support have assured me that, when on the road, this will not be an issue, and that if I am aware of these locations which confuse the GPSR and ride past them, the GPSR should then recalculate the original route and keep me on my intended path.  This obviates the question "how do you know when the GPSR is giving you faulty instructions unless you run a simulation of each and every route and compare it to the route you have molded in BaseCamp?".  The answer to this is, "I don't".  I will just have to wing it, I suppose.  The GPSR and BaseCamp calculate routes differently, it seems, and there is no way to know what the GPSR will do with a route no matter how I modify it before making the transfer.  How I use the "Routing" options under the "Setup" menu in the GPSR (e.g. On Road/Off Road, Car/Motorcycle/Bicycle, etc.) might make a difference, but I have been unable to learn the definitive, correct setting for these options. 


A couple of (hopefully) simple questions, if I may:

1.  What is the best, most simple way for me to save these modified routes to my Mac and then BaseCamp for transfer to the GPSR?  I am betraying my ignorance of all things computer/technological here, as I am not very good at manipulating file data into a Greg-friendly format.  Would it be best just to open each modded route file in BaseCamp, save it to a new list, and transfer that one, big list?

2.  Once the route data has been massaged and loaded, how do I get the waypoint data (Point(s) of Interest only, with no routing data), loaded into the GPSR so that I can find campgrounds, etc.?  Will this be a process which parallels the route modification process?

I so appreciate all of the instruction that you have been able to provide.  It is invaluable and has helped me immensely.  Thank you very, very much.


Pages: [1] 2