Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - freightbike

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16
General Discussion / Re: Bears
« on: May 22, 2013, 05:59:21 pm »
I wonder if anyone has experience with Cougars. You know, the four legged kind. :)

17
This is not related to cog size but to the manufacturers driving choices. The basic bike computer really only needs to tell me what my total mileage and days mileage and time of day are. Not all the splits, cadences and heart rate etc. I found my Planet Bike computer going blank while on a rainy day ride the other day. I just want something rugged, reliable and simple. Any suggestions?

18
General Discussion / Re: Bears
« on: April 16, 2013, 10:17:43 pm »
I definitely agree about the other animals being more of a problem than bears. I once had to hit a large raccoon with a stick to get it away from my dinner. It jumped up on the table as I was eating and tried to growl and snarl me away from my food. Some people I had met while camping on the lower saddle of the Grand Teton, had a marmot chew a hole through their pack, through their bag of granola and out the other side. Squirels, rats and chipmunks, (minibears) Ravens in the san juan islands pecking through the sealed thick plastic wrapper of packaged cheese. A New Zealand kea bird eating part of my bike seat. Farm dogs. I had a pair farm dogs chase me for about ten miles in western Missouri.

19
General Discussion / Re: touring without "eating out"
« on: April 14, 2013, 10:32:34 pm »
I like to bring a dragonfly stove along with a nonstick frypan and two or three pots nested together. I bring along Krusteaze pancake mix and some blueberry syrup. A couple packs of ramen noodles for emergencies crammed in with the pots. Just about any little store will have canned spaghetti and canned vegetables and some kind of protein, hotdogs, spam, tuna. I pack in some instant potato's to thicken things up when it seems needed. Vary the food by whats available, get amazed by the variety when you get to a town that has a big grocery store with a deli. I put yogurt on the pancakes when it's available. I like the dragonfly because it has a fold up wind screen and a flame adjustment that is much more supple than the other MSR's I've used. I burn white gas when I can get it, including keeping an eye out for other campers who might be using it and buying some off them.

20
General Discussion / Re: Bears
« on: April 14, 2013, 10:10:44 pm »
Being aware that you are in bear country, when you are, is always helpfull. Bears are opportunists that seek out food where they can find it. Food is what they are usually after and denying them the opportunity is the best defence against them. Keeping your food and tempting smelling things out of reach and out of your tent helps to avoid conflict. I don't have personal experience with grizzly bears but they tend to have limited ranges and areas where they would be prevalent. The bears you would likely encounter would be black bears. Black bears are of a type that are smaller and less likely to be aggressive unless they are used to getting food from easy sources such as humans. If you are intending to venture into the back country, wearing a bell helps to keep grizzlies from being startled by your sudden appearance. There are chemical sprays to keep bears at bay but there may be problems with their possession and use as well.

21
Go do RAGRAII. One week on that trip and you'll lose all you inhibitions. Might even get lucky.

22
Consider going on a multi day supported trip like one of the many week long regional rides. I would recommend rides like CANDISC or GRABRAWR. They are opportunities to experience riding long distance with helpfull people and many have sag support so if you break down physically or mechanically, you can get a ride to the finish of that days stage. I agree with the others that you have to start out slowly and work your way up to longer and longer trips. When the bug bites you for adventure out on the open road, nothing will get in your way.

23
General Discussion / Re: Traffic burnout?
« on: January 21, 2013, 01:19:34 pm »
I work in the contruction business, namely concrete truck driving. I really get traffic burnout from being on the side of the road in a construction zone. The callous behavior of vehicular traffic traveling through my workspace gets my blood pressure to the boiling point. For some reason, I feel less threatened when I'm bicycling out on the road riding the fog line. I think the difference may be that I have a choice to be there or not and a sense of situational awareness. I use a helmet mounted mirror and my skills as a truck driver to keep the flow of traffic in mindfull perspective.
 When I toured in New Zealand, I got an AA membership to get a hold of maps that showed all the alternative routes to the main highways. Many of these were dirt and gravel roads however the alternative was, at least on the north island, crazy drivers. On the south island, the traffic was down to about a vehicle an hour. The only truly crazy drivers I encountered on the south island were a tour bus company that would not move over the center line regardless of the fact that the two of us were the only things on that stretch of hwy. The downside was the surface of the "metaled" or gravel roads was aggregate of a size we call "inch and a half binder". It wouldn't wash off the road like smaller rock would.
 Interstates, in addition to wide, flat tire potential, trash filled, shoulders, have generally easier grades.However they also have grinding boredom and with that drivers who are not likely to be paying close attention to their driving. Not to mention they tend to isolate traveling from the territory you are traveling through. I also avoid them unless the alternative is worse.
 Dirt roads are a possible alternative except for rain and wash boarding. Having a bike with a suspension frame or front fork might help. Speed is the downside of dirt but the upside is peace and quiet.

24
General Discussion / Re: Realistic time requirements
« on: January 19, 2013, 01:27:41 am »
I think I may set up Miles City as a go, no-go point where if I make it to there by a certain date, I'll continue on to MPLS and if I don't or don't want to I'll end there and bus it home. I really want to tour that part of the west away from the interstates and major towns. I think I'll take Hwy 12 like Jamawani suggested because I like the road less traveled and figuring things out without set expectations and locals not being used to seeing bikes all the time.

25
General Discussion / Re: Bike and Cars - share the road
« on: January 17, 2013, 03:26:03 pm »
Rachel Maddow recently did a great piece on the definition of "Troll". What the radio guy is doing is getting his ratings up by inciting the demographic that listens to his station to call in and rant about some other group. We have the same issues here in MN.

26
Midwest / Re: Katy trail, MO
« on: January 16, 2013, 12:50:56 am »
Did they ever sort out the issues with amtrak and the Ann Rutledge local train?

27
Midwest / Re: North Dakota route
« on: January 16, 2013, 12:48:30 am »
If you do take the Cooperstown route, the community has a nice park/campground, a grocery store, a couple of convenience stores, and a few restaurants or bars with food. The next town to the east is Finley which has a community park with restrooms, a restaurant, convenicence store, and grocery store. Nice territory (I used to live in Cooperstown) with lots of cyclists throughout the summer.
I camped a night in cooperstown five years ago I think, Great place to set up if you like reading books inside your tent all night. So many over head street lights completely cover just about every inch of the park. Carington is much better.

28
General Discussion / Re: Realistic time requirements
« on: January 15, 2013, 08:16:40 pm »
I had thought of taking the northern tier route and ending in Minot or some place further west of that.
The NT no longer goes through Minot, and for darn good reasons.
Amtrak still does. Oh and now I remember, "May all you endless ups and downs be between the sheets! LOL

29
General Discussion / Re: Realistic time requirements
« on: January 15, 2013, 12:51:13 pm »
Thank you, Staehpj1, Yes it is definately better to have no end date. Unfortunately I have only four weeks vacation a year. I had thought of taking the northern tier route and ending in Minot or some place further west of that. I like taking the roads I haven't already biked on and some of the NT area I did back in 83 and on candisc trips. I will have to research what the options are for bus travel getting back if I find myself not wanting to or unable to keep up a grueling pace. With luck the west winds will be calling and I can do some days like my last candisc return, 340 miles in three days. :)

30
General Discussion / Re: Realistic time requirements
« on: January 15, 2013, 03:48:54 am »
I was wondering if US 12 was terribly hilly between,say, Townsend and Forsyth. I have a co-worker at my job who worked on the airforce missle silos who said MT 200 was endless ups and downs out of Greatfalls.
So what. 80% of the country is endless ups and downs. It goes with the territory.
I just remember doing RAGBRAI across the southern part of Iowa and the route was so hilly there was an equivalent elevation gain to bicycling up mt. Everest.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4