GREAT NEWS! I am posting (in part) the email discussions coming from Michigan and Wisconsin. Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:15 PM
Subject: US Bike Route 20
Rich (of League of Michigan Bicyclists),
Josh DeBruyn and Nancy Krupiarz suggested I include you in this.
Below is a message I sent today to Nancy and to Catrine of the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin. Let me know what you think. I apologize for not thinking of LMB in the first place. (See attached map as well)
Regards,
Scott Anderson
----
Catrine and Nancy,
I have just had an e-mail correspondence with Josh DeBruyn, Michigan DOT's nonmotorized coordinator, on the subject of the US Bike Route Corridors identified by AASHTO as going into or through Michigan.
I would like to propose that the two organizations - BFW and MTGA - jointly develop (at a planning level) the US Bike Route 20 corridor. As a high level overview, this route, looking from east to west, starts somewhere in the eastern lower peninsula of Michigan, certainly far to the north of Detroit. I propose Marine City because there is a bicycle-accommodating international border crossing there. It then traverses the lower peninsula of Michigan, going through the Saginaw-Midland area then west to Ludington, using the ferry to cross Lake Michigan to Manitowoc. It then continues going west-northwest through Wisconsin, ending at the intersection of USBR 10 somewhere in NW WI.
I think there are three steps to this preliminary phase. First, propose a draft route for USBR 20. Second, enter into conversations with the state DOT and county/local road agencies and, where trails are used for segments of the route, trail owners/managers, to make sure the route is acceptable to all players. (At this stage I would fully accept the route to be modified somewhat.) Third, present the final version to WisDOT and MDOT and ask them to jointly apply for route designation. Once that's done, assuming AASHTO accepts the route, the next job would be to map and sign the route, which will cost some money; but that is a good way down the road, so I'd prefer not to worry about the endgame yet.
So if you both agree with this idea, let me know, and I would be very pleased to work with DOT people and county/local people, ACA and our two organizations to come up with the first draft. That will take a couple months, then we can figure out how to address step two.
Incidentally there are three USBR corridors which involve both of our states, those corridors designated as USBR 10, 20 and 30. I chose USBR 20 for a first cut because I live near the east end of it and can very easily propose a good routing for the first (easternmost) 55 miles of the route with no effort at all; I've traveled it repeatedly myself

Let me know what you think! A conference call might be a good way to start.
Cheers,
Scott Anderson