Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - paddleboy17

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 39
Gear Talk / Re: Trek 520 poor brakes
« on: November 12, 2013, 12:43:44 pm »
Make sure that the rim is true and free of surface imperfections.

A "travel agent" is used to allow non linear pull brake levers work with linear pull (aka V) breaks.  This might give you some mechanical advantage.  They are cheap, so it is worth trying.

Lastly, this sounds like a job, albeit an expensive job, for hydraulic brakes.  Yes they are expensive, but they do know how to clamp.  ::)

Gear Talk / Re: Shipping My LHT with Racks and Fenders
« on: November 12, 2013, 12:36:47 pm »
I second your position.  Since when to golfers deserve so much respect?  Airlines (other than SouthWest, and I can't speak for Frontier), know how to ship golf clubs and do not know how to ship bicycles.

Gear Talk / Re: Shipping My LHT with Racks and Fenders
« on: November 05, 2013, 12:43:06 pm »
Actually, I was pushing both options. 

If Amtrak had a workable train with roll on/roll off service, you could get there without having to disassemble your bike.  Sure it might be as slow as driving, and not a fiscal bargain, but it is an option I keep trying to explore on my trips.  Closest I ever came to shipping by Amtrak was an Amtrak bus ($10 for unlimited use of bay #2).

Both Amtrak and Greyhound shipping are worth looking into and you would not be bound by the usual box limits that go with shipping via DHL, FedEx, or UPS.  Greyhound can probably get from anywhere to anywhere else, whereas Amtrak might require you to drive to Chicago in order to ship to Tuscon.

Just remember that the bike store box will probably be considered oversize by DHL, FedEx, or UPS, and still be expensive to ship.  USPS might be more forgiving.  If you think you are going to do a lot of traveling, then one of the commercial cases might pay for itself.  In shipping a bicycle,  it really is all about boxes' length + width + height, and then its weight.

Gear Talk / Re: Shipping My LHT with Racks and Fenders
« on: October 31, 2013, 12:16:10 pm »
Leaving racks and fenders on will require a really big box (say an Amtrak bike box), and a box that big will be really expensive to ship via FedEx, UPS, or DHL.  I think Amtrak may have a freight service, I know that Greyhound Bus has a freight service.  I would look into GreyHound Freight.  It might be $75 -$100 to ship a large box from one bus terminal to another bus terminal.  The critical dimension to ship with Greyhound Freight is the height of the cargo bay.

I shipped my bike from Detroit (MI) to Salem (OR) this summer.  It was $115, and I used an old Performance Bike hard case.  The case looks a lot like the one Thule sells.  Yes, I had to tear the bike apart to fit in the case, but the case fits under the FedEx oversize limit.  FedEx, UPS, and DHL have similar limits for what they consider oversize.  A regular bike box is in the oversize category, and the rate is much higher.  An Amtrak bike box is even much larger, and FedEx/UPS/DHL may not even accept it due to size.  Plus they may have a fit because the Amtrak box needs to travel upright.

You might look into taking an Amtrak train instead of flying.  Some Amtrak trains have roll on/roll off service for bikes.
Please let me know what you ultimately do.

Gear Talk / Re: Old battery systems, convert to USB?
« on: October 24, 2013, 01:04:51 pm »
i bought a battery the size of a deck of cards.  It will charge an iPhone 3X or almost charge an iPad.  $70 on Amazon.  Just dispose of your NightRider batteries in an environmentally responsible way.

General Discussion / Re: Day Jobs?
« on: October 21, 2013, 12:16:53 pm »
No one is going to like my answer...

If it is just you, you have options.  But if you have a wife and or kids, you do NOT have options.  The grown up thing to do is put them first, and keep  your dreams on hold until you situation permits you to indulge in them.  In my case, I am very much looking forward to retirement.  I am 55, and have a 35 year backlog of neglected personal projects.  In 10 years, assuming I get to retire in comfort, I will have a 45 year backlog of neglected personal projects to start getting caught up on.

General Discussion / Re: Motivation: why ride?
« on: October 02, 2013, 12:38:02 pm »
I am only able to do shorter trips, but I don't know anyone that tours at all.

I like the fact that I move myself and my possessions daily.  The "fix" leaves me better prepared to meet life, and confident that I can survive should civilization collapse.

General Discussion / Re: complete newb, GDMBR in 2014
« on: August 27, 2013, 01:28:27 pm »
I rode a section in New Mexico with my buddys, about 12 years ago.  I think my experience is applicable to you though.

We used hard tail mountain bikes, with 26" wheels (29" wheels did not exist back then), and we used trailers.  I remember water being a bit of an issue as it was harder to resupply than we thought it would be.  Several streams shown on our maps were dry, and there were feces laden mud pits that we refused to drink from (this being cattle country).  So make sure that you manage your potable water. 

In rough country, you may not make 50 miles a day.

I am a city boy and do not normally interact with cows.  Not making eye contact with them seemed to be the best strategy.  We had a lot of instances of the cattle bolting in response to seeing us.  The cattle would then run parallel to us.  At some point the fence would angle towards the road, and it was a race to see how would get to the gate first.  There is a grate across the road at each gate, and cattle cannot cross the grate.  If the race looks close, just let the cows win as they will settle down, go back to eating, and forget what the fuss about.

Am I the only with cattle stories?

One of my buddy's went back a few years later and rode Colorado.  It sounds like Colorado was not as difficult as New Mexico was.

I would drop frame weight from your consideration.  Rotating weight is what really matters, and that will be under your control.

If the LHT strikes you as heavy, that is probably due to the non-frame choices due to completing the bike.    All steel frames will be on the order of 4 pounds.

Long wheel base to give you clearance is in direct conflict with short wheel base to give you agility.  No easy way out here...

What about using a trailer with your current bike?  I like personally like trailers for off road and prefer panniers on road. 

I think you need to tabulate and rate your criteria. 

Sounds like you really have your heart set on a cross bike, which may not make the best touring bike.
Some other contenders that you could look at, which are in your price range, include the Soma Saga, Surly Cross Check, and Surly Long Haul Trucker

You have expressed fairly low gear weights, but don't forget about feature creep.  Your cargo needs could go up.  A cross bike should have a shorter wheel base and potential heel strike issues.  A touring bike is going to be longer, but less nimble.  I think you need to sort out your requirements, and then a frame will probably choose itself.

General Discussion / Re: Road bike for touring??
« on: August 15, 2013, 12:12:52 pm »
You should plan at least one overnight trip to try out your stuff.  Better to learn what you don't like early, while you can still make changes.  You may like or dislike the bike and trailer, and you may like or dislike your gear too.

General Discussion / Re: Brooks Sadles
« on: August 01, 2013, 10:29:09 am »
Jane, I am one (male) who was unable to ride my Brooks B17 Special.  After much advise from fellow forum members on adjustments etc I ran into medical issues that I just had to pass it on to a friend.  Beautiful saddle.
However, my wife now has a Brooks B17S (woman's version) and she loves it.  It is the only saddle she has been comfortable riding.  She is still in a break in period but has told me she loves it.
Just thought I'd throw this in.

If your medical issue was prostrate, Monarch Leather in Wisconsin will put a prostrate friendly cut out in.  Monarch Leather is the manufacturer for Selle AnAtomica saddles.  Contact Selle AnAtomica for details.

I think there are too many factors here to draw conclusions.
Any extreme athlete is going to abuse their body, and it does not matter what the sport is.
Diet is really important, be it what you eat daily, or what you eat on the TransAm.
I think you can do a long distance tour and not shorten your life expectancy. 

General Discussion / Re: Brooks Sadles
« on: July 01, 2013, 12:59:00 pm »
Black treated leather is harder and takes longer to break in.  White and natural (honey) leathers are softer and take less time to break in.  Different saddle designs may take more or less time to break in.  I had a Brooks Conquest (no longer sold) that broke in during a day of riding.  I also had a Brooks Team Pro that took 3 months to break in.  Even within a color and saddle type, there are variations.  I have 3 Brooks B-17s, and the last one I bought (a B-17 Imperial) took a week to break in.

Breaking in means that the saddle stretches and deforms to match you.  So your body is supported over the entire contact area of the saddle, and not just 2 or 3 hot spots.

My advice would be to get one of the Brooks honey colored saddles.  Talk to the folks as Wallinford bikes,, and see which one they think would be right for you.   They also carry quality leather saddles from other makers that have entered the saddle market.  My Conquest has springs, and I don't think they do that much.  I don't think you need springs for road riding.

There is also Selle-An-Atomica, sold only by them.  This operates on a slightly different strategy.  Your butt flops on two semi-independent leather hammocks.  I have a friend who swears by them, but I was not impressed.  There is no break in time needed though.  It is worth your time to look at though.

Guys, especially middle aged ones, often have prostrate issues that need saddles with cut-outs for "the goods".  I have no idea if there is a female equivalence.

Regardless of what saddle you chose, it needs to be set up properly.  Loosely this means level with the front of your knee over the ball of your foot when the pedal is at the 3 o-clock position.  It is just a guide, and feel free to deviate in favor of your comfort.  I use a carpenters level, and like my saddle nose down from level by one bubble. 

Gear Talk / Re: Solar Panel - Yea or Nay?
« on: July 01, 2013, 12:32:59 pm »
The solar panel is a bit iffy. I recently attempted to start a tour on the west coast in WA and OR using a very large solar panel that was to charge up a battery pack to power a C-PAP device. The panel was flexible enough to drape over my BOB trailer but because of cloudy, rainy and heavy woods, I was not able to get more than two or three hours run time on my C-PAP. The panel measured 21"x 30". Maybe it would have worked better east of the coastal mountains.

This is not a fair comparison from my point of view.  Your CPAP batteries are huge (3x+) in comparison to what the iPhone and GPS combined need.  CPAP batteries would be much more difficult to charge from solar, whereas one could charge some AAs and an iPhone.  With new iron phosphate batteries being so much cheaper than they used to be, I would just get a 10 or 15 AH battery and plan on AC charging for your CPAP.  I have 10AH x 12VDC NiMH batteries, but this is the last season that I am going to use them.  Recharging wastes half of the input power as heat.  Lithium ion batteries are so much more efficient at charging, and iron phosphate batteries ( 1 of 3 different lithium ion implementation) are a better approximation for the lead acid cells that a CPAP machine was designed to run on.

I do agree with your outcome though.  You have to bring AC chargers for cloudy days anyways, and AC charging should be available.  In a pinch, alkaline AAs can be bought for the GPS.  And rechargable NiMH AAs are going to waste half of the input power as heat.  I carry a POWERGEN external battery which should easily give you 3 full charges to your iPhone.  So as desirable as solar charging is, I just don't think it is quite ready for prime time yet when it comes to bike touring in the USA.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 39