Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - staehpj1

Pages: 1 ... 96 97 [98] 99 100 ... 149
1456
Routes / Re: Trans Am Ride
« on: September 27, 2010, 11:24:43 am »
I generally agree with what John said.  Weather is probably better with a East to West ride since you miss the heat and humidity in the East and get to the Rockies when the snow is gone.  That said there are good reasons to go either way, but either will be a great experience.

In the West Portland OR is probably the best airport to use.  I had never heard of anyone using the Newport News airport, but it does look very convenient to the route.  Newport News looks like a pretty small airport so you will probably have to fly in to somewhere else like Reagan or Dulles in Washington DC and then get a flight to Newport News.  Alternately folks take a bus, ride their bikes, or rent a car to get to the start from one of the DC airports.

The TA is pretty nice without the need for any diversions.  We made a few local diversions but only because of specific to us reasons.

As far as how long it will take...  That is pretty dependent on you.  We took 73 days, which I think is fairly "normal".  Some take substantially more or a bit less.  Personally I like to have a very open ended schedule if at all possible because I hate to be a slave to a schedule.  That may not be an option for you though, given the demands of international travel.


1457
General Discussion / Re: what cycling computer to get?
« on: September 25, 2010, 11:10:41 am »
I agree with Paddleboy17, I like knowing my cadence.
Just another perspective on that...  I find it kind of like my heart rate monitor.  It was interesting for a few weeks and then I pretty much knew what each heart rate felt like.  Similarly I can pretty closely guess my cadence.  I do use it sometimes on my road bike, but I don't think I have ever bothered to switch to a mode that displays cadence when on tour.

So if you use a cadence meter religiously when training or performance riding you may like one on your touring bike too, otherwise there is a good chance you may not wind up using it much or at all

1458
Routes / Re: Sierra Cascades Advice
« on: September 24, 2010, 07:39:26 am »
Our experience may or my not be typical, but you might find some useful info in our journal.
http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/MountainMan

If nothing else it is worth looking at the pictures of the stunning scenery.

1459
Routes / Re: Sierra Cascades Advice
« on: September 24, 2010, 07:05:16 am »
I would suggest that you either allow more time than you think you will need or plan to be flexible about your finishing point.  I found that I could make much poorer time than I expected due to the heat and difficulty of the climbs.  This is a very tough route compared to something like the Trans America or at least the southern part is.  At least that is my impression after having ridden the whole TA and the southern part of the SC,  Also there are places along the way that are worth spending some time.  I highly recommend spending some time hiking in Sequoia and Yosemite national parks for example.

Weather is a difficult thing to plan for on the SC.

Starting in the South...  Once the passes are open the desert is likely to be brutally hot.  We started in early June and my little thermometer while not reliable, read 115 F at times.  I know that I could have definitely done with less desert and less heat.

You might be able to do better starting late-ish in the season in the North.  How late?  I am not sure, but looking at the closure dates for Tioga Pass from previous years may give some clue of how late you can still get over the passes.

1460
General Discussion / Re: what cycling computer to get?
« on: September 24, 2010, 06:54:11 am »
So I am putting the finishing touches on my dream touring bike (pics to come) and I know 0 about cycling computers, I think wireless is a must, besides that.... I really don't have clue. I have access to QBP so if it is a brand they carry that's a plus. Otherwise what can you guys recommended?
I agree that the Cateye models are nice, but recommend wired.  I like the MTB model with a heavier duty wire (Enduro 8?).

I have tried a variety of wireless in a variety of brands and found them all to be prone to interference.  Too often you come out of a diner to see that your bike parked by the neon sign thinks it went 60 miles while you were eating.  Then there are the times when it thinks it is going 80 mph while sitting under a power line or electric fence.  I gave up an only use wired ones.

1461
Routes / Re: Renting a van to transport bicycles
« on: September 21, 2010, 12:10:47 pm »
The only way to transport myself and my bike one way that I have found is U-Haul. Everyone else makes you bring the vehicle back to the point of origin. I just ask for the smallest thing they have. They used to have little Toyota vans but apparently they are no longer available.

If you do use U-Haul, carefully check the van for dents or any damage, cleanliness, fuel level, etc. before signing for it. Some of the yards are pretty lax about such things. I got a truly dirty van with a faulty fuel gauge in Moab UT.
Check the prices against the rental car places for one way rentals.  I have found way better rates from rental car places than I have from U-Haul and by a pretty large margin.  When we rented one way from Portland OR to Newport OR (in 2007) I think the price quoted for the smallest U-Haul they had on hand was 2.5 times what Enterprise charged us.  My experience is limited and it may vary regionally, but do check prices first.

1462
Routes / Re: Renting a van to transport bicycles
« on: September 21, 2010, 06:47:02 am »
You'll be sharing the bus with some normal poor people, but a lot of crazy alcoholics and drug addicts.
Between my family and I, we wound up sitting next to some "interesting" characters almost every time we used Greyhound.  These characters included drunks, a pimp, and newly released convicts on their ride home from prison.  I don't especially recommend the Greyhound, but it usually does result in a good story.

Take the Greyhound.
It's a dog of a way to get around.
Take the Greyhound.
It's a dog gone easy way to get you down.
(from the Harry Chapin tune)

1463
Routes / Re: Eugene to Baker City
« on: September 19, 2010, 03:42:17 pm »
I heard one couple assert that McKenzie Pass from the west is the toughest climb on the TransAm, although I'm not sure I buy that. It is beautiful, however, and I wouldn't want to miss it.
Definitely far from the hardest IMO.  It was very pretty and also interesting with a wooded climb, big lava field, good vistas, and the observatory at the top.

1464
Routes / Re: Eugene to Baker City
« on: September 19, 2010, 12:54:07 pm »
We did it between June 15th and June 20th and had good weather.  The only thing is that McKenzie Pass may not be open that early some years.

If your schedules is flexible, I'd say to try to catch McKenzie Pass when it is open to bikes, but not yet open to cars.  It is fun to catch it before cars are allowed.

If you have to pick a date ahead of time, I'd try to pick a date when McKenzie is likely to have recently opened and then if it is closed use the less desirable Santiam Pass alternate route,

Check out http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION4/McKenzieHighwayClosure.shtml for the dates when McKenzie has opened in the past.

1465
Routes / Re: Help required for current trans america-rockies or not?
« on: September 18, 2010, 12:39:20 pm »
Its apparent some people have never ridden in the Rockies. 
I find it amusing that the person you seem to be referring to lives in, rides in, and has toured very extensively in the Colorado Rockies.

You say it only snows at "higher elevations" in Spring thru Fall, but what do you call higher elevations?  In Colorado the Trans America doesn't dip below 7,500' for about 190 miles and the large majority of that is above 8,000'.  It tops out a bit over 11,500' and I personally consider the whole 190 mile section to be at "higher elevations".

I won't comment on whether it is wise for the OP to go that route in the suggested timeframe since I have no experience with the area at that time of year.  I will say that I would definitely give serious consideration to valygrl's advice about the area, knowing that she lives there and has toured there extensively.

1466
In the US, Southwest Airlines and Frontier charge $50 per one-way trip (not per flight if you have to change planes)  - so if you can use one of those it doesn't really add that much to the cost.
I would add that they don't charge for two checked bags (the bike counts as one though) so the $50 includes the other bag that most other airlines would charge you for making SW (Frontier too?) an even better deal.

Also, think about what you are going to do with the bike box during your trip.  With a real bike case you have to ship it to your destination and/or have it stored, with a regular bike you can just get a new cardboard box for free at a bike shop at the end of the trip.
+1 The fact that I would have to deal with a case on either end would be enough to negate the benefit of couplers.  Since I generally never start and finish my tour in the same city I would have to either ship or carry the case for the whole tour.  For me that would be unacceptable unless the rucksack is very light in which case I would be worried about damage to the bike.

Note that I am not saying that the couplers aren't great for some riders, just that you should consider the points mentioned before deciding.

1467
Routes / Re: Route Advice
« on: September 16, 2010, 02:21:46 pm »
Isn't it interesting how two people can look at the same facts and come to opposite conclusions?  We went E-W because:

Yeah, it can be spun any number of ways depending on individual wants, needs, and preferences.

BTW, do you still think the Appalachians were harder than the Rockies?  Some east-bounders were in such good shape by the time they got to Kentucky that they didn't think they were hard at all.  I thought the Appalachians were about twice as hard as the Rockies.  Appalachians were 3x as steep in places, but not as high, and after 30 minutes, what difference does the length of the climb make?.

On the TA, yes I still think the Appalachians were harder than the Cascades or Rockies.  On a different route maybe not.

After the TA, I thought that western climbs were just generally easier, other than being long, since they were typically better designed and graded.  We spent very little time in the west climbing at more than 6-8% on the TA.  Then I rode the southern part of the Sierra Cascades route and realized that there were some very hard climbs in the west.  That trip was quite difficult for me and I now have a new respect the climbs out west in general.

1468
General Discussion / Re: Invitation to join warmshowers.org
« on: September 15, 2010, 11:30:28 am »
;D :-\ Staying with strangers on their property or in their homes is very dangerious.
We have no idea what kind of people we are staying with are like. What are you're thoughts.

Since you asked...
Given that your two posts so far are this one and one asking if it is safe to carry a small propane cylinder in your trailer, my thought is that you are either trolling or more than a bit paranoid.

Stays with strangers are usually some of the high points of my tours.  As far as risk goes I figure I am more likely to be harmed by a car or truck than by a host.

1469
General Discussion / Re: Amtrack confusion - policy vs reality?
« on: September 15, 2010, 09:15:58 am »
A check of prices for UHaul finds that it isn't cheaper than Amtrak.  It may be faster but it is anything but cheaper.  Don't forget to add the price of gas.  At $3 per gallon the vehicle will get about 10 miles per gallon so the cost will add up quickly.
Not surprising.  If I remember correctly, when we were looking to rent a vehicle to haul three of us and our bikes from Portland OR to the coast, U-Haul was a good bit more than double what we paid Enterprise for a one way rental.

1470
Routes / Re: Route Advice
« on: September 13, 2010, 06:30:41 pm »
Agreed. Unless you have other constraints, go east-to-west. That direction has everything in its favor and nothing against (not even wind).
Weather can be much better E-W and there is generally a lot in favor of that direction.

Also I agree that prevailing winds are not a good reason to go W-E.  On the route the OP is proposing it is probably a wash.  On the TA I think E-W has an advantage.  On the NT I suspect W-E might have an edge wind wise.  In any case I don't think that wind should be a major factor in choosing direction of travel for a summer XC tour.

That said I can't agree that there is nothing in favor of W-E.  There are quite a few reasons why someone might choose W-E (like we did in 2007).  Here are a few reasons why we did:
  • We wanted the air travel out of the way up front.
  • We think that the Appalachians are the hardest part and wanted to do them when we were a bit road hardened.
  • We thought that starting far from home made bailing out harder.
  • It was awesome that we finished close to home and were greeted by friends and family at the end.

There are lots of reasons why someone might choose one way or the other. 

BTW, I personally would much rather start or finish in the PNW than in San Francisco.

Pages: 1 ... 96 97 [98] 99 100 ... 149