Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - staehpj1

Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 146
Routes / Re: southern tier map for friends and family
« on: February 24, 2010, 10:42:36 am »
Yes the ACA version is good if you keep to their routes but I like to make side trips or connectors so a more detailed map would be good.

Thanks anyway.
Most wall maps that show the entire us don't show too much detail, so in any case you will be doing a bit of guessing at the exact point to put the dot or stick a pin.  That said some of the wall maps do show a lot more towns than the AC overview map.

OTOH since the OP was specifically referring to the ST the AC map sounds perfect to me.

Routes / Re: southern tier map for friends and family
« on: February 24, 2010, 09:47:24 am »
Though it sounds like this might not be detailed enough on it's own for following you on your ride, you could start with the network map we have available as a pdf (at no cost!) on the Routes & Mapping page.

Click on Map of All ACA Routes, first line after Adventure Cycling Maps in the upper right of the page.

For what it is worth that scales up nicely if you have access to a large plotter or know someone who does.  As Jennifer says the detail isn't there wrt smaller towns and other features, but it is a very nice looking map.  Kinkos could print you one 48" x 36" or whatever for probably under $50.

Routes / Re: southern tier map for friends and family
« on: February 23, 2010, 07:25:49 pm »
If you got your amateur radio license before you left you could equip your bike with APRS and your family could log on their computer and follow your progress in real time.
Or maybe go with the Spot device.  Another thing to carry and more expensive than I will go for due to the subscription cost, but still pretty cool.

Routes / Re: southern tier map for friends and family
« on: February 23, 2010, 03:01:11 pm »
I've had a couple of requests for a map of the southern tier route - one that folks back home can hang on the wall and plot my progress as I ride.  Is there something like that already created? 
Check out for one option.

If someone is willing to do it a big paper map of the US is pretty cool way to do this and it makes a great keepsake after the trip.  Mine from the TA is on my wall next to my computer and I have been adding trips as i take then.  It is really cool to look at the map and reminisce.  It isn't too hard to look up the town names on google maps to figure out roughly where to mark the stops.  I use little sticky dots in various colors a different color for each tour.

Gear Talk / Re: suspension seat post...
« on: February 20, 2010, 04:35:41 pm »
staehpj1 has a good point about the non-obvious.  The back cannot handle much of a bump without injury if you're sitting up.  There's just no flexibility that way, and the forces go through the roof, threatening to herniate discs and so on.  The flexibility gained by putting it more horizontal and suspending it from the ends allows it to take the bumps without damage.
That has been my experience, but...  While a bolt upright position is probably the worst thing for most folks backs, I should probably add that it makes sense to not force yourself too quickly into a low bar position.  It is better to ease into it lowering the bars little by little over a period of weeks or months.  Initially it might take a bit for the back to adjust to it.  In the long run it will be better for most though.

Routes / Re: New Sierra Cascade Route
« on: February 20, 2010, 04:22:38 pm »
Scott, I am curious how bad the "nasty section of 89" actually is compared to say other Adventure Cycling routes.  I suspect I am more traffic tolerant than most, but in general I had no big complaints with AC's choices on the Trans America and if anything, I second guessed the places where they went out of the way to get off the beaten path.

I know that on the TA I didn't mind most of the sections that folks complained about traffic wise.  I think maybe we were lucky to ride the worst sections on days of the week and times of day that were better than average, but I really didn't mind the sections with logging or coal trucks.  I guess that the rental motor homes concerned me more than anything, but I still found Yellowstone's traffic in the acceptable range.

Can you comment on what I might expect on 89 compared to roads on the TA?

Gear Talk / Re: suspension seat post...
« on: February 20, 2010, 11:04:59 am »
I used to have serious back problems, bad enough that surgery was advised by some doctors.  I've been through multiple courses of steroid therapy, physical therapy, and epidural steroid injections.  The latter combined with finally figuring out the right exercises for me finally did the trick.  I have since been able to ride, run, and trail run without back pain.

WRT to riding without back pain I find that for me the following works:
  • Avoid a sit up and beg posture favored by many tourists.  Riding in a relaxed fashion with most of your weight carried by your legs, and with bars well below the saddle.  Elbows should be well bent and not much weight should be on the hands.  The arms shoulders and even hands should be loose and relaxed.
  • That will require that you maintain good core fitness and work toward a form that is fluid and relaxed.
  • For me this means bars 4-5" below the saddle.
  • I do whatever it takes to sleep well and comfortably.  Waking up all stiff and sore in a bad start for the day.  That means carrying a decent sleeping pad and changing position at intervals during the night.
  • At the slightest hint of back pain during the day I do my stretches.

I am convinced that sitting bolt upright on the bike is absolutely the worst thing, at least for me.  The jolts and bumps go right up the spine.  I find that mimicking the form of racers rather than the form of most tourists to be far more comfortable once it is mastered.  If you decide to try that approach... Ease into it, as it takes come conditioning and practice to master.

General Discussion / Re: Thank you! ("sleep" poll)
« on: February 20, 2010, 10:35:36 am »
I am surprised no one has yet said they sleep better on tour.  I almost did, but I generally sleep well where ever I am.  Ideally I would have said yes to three of the possible answers:
  • During a bike trip
  • I can sleep most anywhere
  • I need a lot of sleep

On the eating portion of the OP's comments.  I eat dinner early in the evening and don't eat huge meals at all.  I nibble constantly through the day though and find that works well for me.

Routes / Re: New Sierra Cascade Route
« on: February 17, 2010, 01:06:52 pm »
Good book, but...  It was written 20 years ago, so I would be careful about relying on the info being up to date.

Also it should be noted that Bil Paul (the author of the book) was the person who did the legwork for AC for this route.  Check out:
for more details about that.

Also my tour journal for my upcoming trip has some more info and a few links that just might be useful.  That can be found at:

Routes / Re: Elevation chart for Atlantic Coast route?
« on: February 14, 2010, 12:32:54 pm »
I agree with dubovsmj.  Additionally an elevation chart for the route will probably be misleading unless it is broken down into very short sections.  The short repetitive climbs tend to get lost in an elevation chart of any length.

Gear Talk / Re: Rectangular vs mummy sleeping bag
« on: February 11, 2010, 04:46:47 pm »
The weight difference would be quite a bit.  Enough that I personally wouldn't even consider a rectangular bag.  You know better what you are willing to carry though.

General Discussion / Re: Best Cell phone coverage across US???
« on: February 10, 2010, 09:07:31 am »

No one offers complete coverage everywhere, and so you are best to ignore the commercials.  Every region has local cell phone operators that give equal or better coverage than the national mega-telecom companies.
It is true that no one offers complete coverage everywhere, but one carrier (Verizon) is head and shoulders above the rest for everywhere I have toured or done other rural travel in flyover land.  As far as "local cell phone operators that give equal or better coverage than the national mega-telecom companies", I have my doubt that they generally exist in much of the US.  On the Trans America when we didn't have a Verizon signal we generally didn't have a signal at all.  The one exception I noticed was the Riggins Idaho area and the carrier there was another one of "the national mega-telecom companies" (AT&T).

My highest recommendation is this:  bring the cell phone you already have, as it will work for 911 calls anywhere.  For all non-emergency calls, just ask a local.  99 times out of 100, people have been helpful and let me use their phone.
That or just use a carrier that offers decent coverage so you will seldom if ever need to ask someone to use their phone.  I can't see myself asking to use someone's phone in a non emergency situation.  I'd rather use the carrier that has the best coverage and call home only when I have a signal.

I never considered the ability to call 911 as a huge priority and if my phone didn't offer decent coverage for regular calls I'd leave it home.  Maybe that is because I grew up and lived the majority of my life before cell phones or 911 existed.  It might also be partly because a substantial portion of many of my trips were in places with no signal much of the time.  Also even in the most remote parts of the US I usually see a car go by every 20 or 30 minutes.  For an emergency call, I'd have no hesitation about flagging down a car.

Off road touring, I can see 911 being more useful, but most of the back country travel I have done there was no cellular signal most of the time any way.

General Discussion / Re: maximum weight 2
« on: February 09, 2010, 05:40:13 pm »
thanx for the replies but what i mean is what can the tires and or frame support for weight including my 160 pound body
At 160 pounds I can't see it being an issue unless you want to take an awful lot of stuff or ride a low spoke count performance road bike.  I can't give specific numbers for various bikes though.

Routes / Re: New Sierra Cascade Route
« on: February 09, 2010, 03:07:47 pm »
I checked as promised and...  I couldn't find a number for total elevation gain anywhere in any of the info that I have.

Routes / Re: New Sierra Cascade Route
« on: February 09, 2010, 09:53:41 am »
So exciting to see the over view map!  Anyone know how much climbing?  The GDR has something like 200,000 ft of climbing.  Is this similar?  Did they solve the problems of dangerous logging truck areas?  I was actually hoping some dirt workaround would have been found for that.  Any more info?  Thanks kathy
I too was excited to see the map and can't wait for more details and the actual maps.

I don't know if the Bil Paul book gives a total or not, but I will try to remember to check tonight.  It does have elevation profiles for each section and they don't look horrible.  Plenty of climbing as expected, but it looks like long not so steep grades typical of roads in the West.  That is not based on personal experience with this route, but only from a bit of perusing the book, so don't take it as reliable info.  That said comparing the profiles with those on the TA (which I did ride) makes me think the route is pretty do-able.

Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 146