Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - staehpj1

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 150
31
I have generally found the AC routes to be so easy to follow that I leave my dedicated GPS home.  I do sometimes use my smart phone for directions to a particular stop, service, or attraction.

I have used an etrex for an on/off road tour and it worked out well.  Personally though I found it a lot more trouble to program in the route, deal with batteries, and so on than it is worth on most routes especially if you will be on the road only.

32
General Discussion / Re: Careful where you buy stuff
« on: January 31, 2016, 08:00:48 am »
I usually just get a room or stay with a host when in high risk cities and use a little 5 ounce cable lock the rest of the time.  If I need to shop I take my bike in with me.  At one point I considered buying a heavy duty chain or U Lock, but when I saw the weights I balked.  Even the mini U Lock in the Fahgettaboudit model was 4.3 pounds and some of the chain/lock combos were over 8 pounds  The Palmy aluminum was 0.8 pounds, but is probably as easy to cut or jack open as my 5 ounce cable lock.

33
General Discussion / Re: camping on city parks
« on: January 28, 2016, 04:35:34 pm »
Is it always necessary to do this ?
No it isn't always necessary.  I think there were a couple times that we did and way more where we didn't. More often the town parks were in small enough towns that there were no police to ask even if we had wanted to.  I think we did ask a few times, but mostly only where the AC map specifically said to do so.

In small town parks not listed on an AC map, I sometimes ask someone "Do you think anyone will bother me if I stay in my tent overnight in that park".  That might be a clerk in the general store or who ever I happened to meet any way.

In bigger towns or nearer the coasts I always asked if I didn't know it was OK.  Sometimes I ask at the firehouse, police station, or courthouse.  In a really big park I ask the park staff or park manager.  You can almost always find something if you ask around.  I have asked at churches or asked librarians.  Sometimes they would make a few calls and I'd have a place on someones lawn or on a churches property.  Sometimes I'd even get an invite to stay with someones family.

34
Gear Talk / Re: 2016 Cannondale Touring Bikes
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:34:38 am »
I actually like doubles just for touring, but none of the road doubles offer a small enough inner ring IMO.  I have gotten around this on older bikes by using a triple with the outer ring removed.  A MTB double would be another option.  The road FD should shift it fine with a bit of fiddling to get the adjustment right, assuming the FD can be moved low enough on the seat tube for the smaller rings

35
Gear Talk / Re: 2016 Cannondale Touring Bikes
« on: January 27, 2016, 07:43:43 am »
I have not actually seen one of the 2016 ones, but have looked over the specs.  I will say that the previous touring models were pretty nice.  I don't personally care for all of the choices they made on these bikes though.  On a touring bike Id rather have seen a smaller ring available on the crank (it doesn't look like it will take a smaller on on that crank).  DT spokes are great and it wouldn't really worry me but, I'd rather have seen them go with double butted spokes.  Oh, and I'd definitely not have chosen the Marathon Plus tires.  All of that may suit you better than it does me though.

Also I kind of wonder why a loaded touring bike for credit card touring?  Not sure how much you plan to carry, but I'd think the bike was overkill for lighter loads I'd expect for credit card touring.  Just me but once I got the weight down to even lightweight camping and cooking I started riding a sportier bike and left the loaded touring bike at home.  For me that happened at 20 pounds of gear and under, which to me at least would seem to be more than would be needed for credit card touring.  Then again some folks like to carry a lot more than I would.

36
IMHO, Yosemite is striking, but after two days in the valley and perhaps a day going over the pass, I would think you'd have seen it all.  (Unless you're taking lots of pictures, and want to capture five different features/angles each at sunset or sunrise.)

I almost never stop for an extra day anywhere, but stayed a week in Yosemite doing various side hikes as well as seeing some of the exhibits in the valley.  I thought it was well worth the time.

Yellowstone has a day or two of geothermal features, but the north and northeast quadrants are much more scenic than the southwest leg the TransAm takes you on.  You'll be so close to the Tetons it'd be a shame to miss that.  A week's sightseeing in Yellowstone and the Tetons seems reasonable, with short day hikes and different scenery every day.  The tough part is getting out of there; the Jackson airport is perhaps the best choice up to Bozeman or Billings to catch a bus a distant second choice.

We were pretty satisfied with a hour hike here and there while riding through Yellowstone so were were only two nights there.  To be fair, we didn't do the parts the TA doesn't go through.  We also didn't do the Tetons spur.  You get a pretty good look at the Tetons on the TA main route.  I have since driven the spur in the car.  It was very pretty but didn't make me think we made a mistake by skipping the spur, in part because I am not inclined to do out and back detours and in part because there were similar (but less sweeping) views from the TA.

37
I have not done the northern portion of the Sierra Cascades route, but did do the southern part.  Having done the TA I have also ridden through Yellowstone.  I found I enjoyed Yosemite more than Yellowstone.  I found Yosemite worth taking a week to do hikes and tourist stuff.  Yellowstone was nice, the geothermal features were interesting, and the wildlife viewing was interesting, but if I had to choose between them Yosemite would win out.

As far as how much time to allow, the SC route is exceedingly difficult; you will need to be in good form and will likely need to allow more time than you would on almost any other tours.  That said it is exceedingly beautiful and worth the effort.

There is amtrak service to Yosemite from San Francisco (part bus part train).

There is also bus service using Greyhound and YARTS buses.

http://www.nps.gov/yose/planyourvisit/publictransportation.htm

38
Routes / Re: Transamerica: West to East, are the passes open in May?
« on: January 25, 2016, 10:20:50 am »
To reply to staehpj1 - from the Oregon Department of Transportation website regarding McKenzie Pass.
Thanks.  I looked and found it there since you mentioned it.  I will add that when they said that the road was scheduled to open June 20th, they also said "weather permitting".  To me that makes it sound like it won't be any earlier, but might be later depending on the amount of snow in late winter and spring.

Of course it typically is open to bicycles a bit ahead of the official opening.

39
Routes / Re: Transamerica: West to East, are the passes open in May?
« on: January 22, 2016, 11:52:46 am »
McKenzie Pass is currently expected to be open to traffic the third Monday in June.
I am curious where that date came from.  It would seem to be hard to predict accurately with the rest of the Winter and Spring still ahead of us.  I'd agree that is a fairly likely opening date, but wouldn't count on it being at all accurate though.

40
Routes / Re: Transamerica: West to East, are the passes open in May?
« on: January 22, 2016, 08:26:01 am »
In recent years it has been rare for McKenzie pass to open before June, and early July isn't unusual.  It typically can be ridden a week or two before it opens for cars.  Santiam pass is an alternate to McKenzie and is plowed all year, but I'd hate to miss McKenzie.  Being an El Nino year I'd expect late openings.

The year I rode the TA (2007), we started June 11th and it was fine, but I figured we were on the early side.  If it were me I'd try to start later or to start in the East.

http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION4/pages/mckenziehighwayclosure.aspx

41
I have had company on both my coast to coast tours, but have done a few 1000 mile or longer tours solo and loneliness wasn't a problem.  I generally wind up meeting either other tourists or local folks pretty often, so getting lonely doesn't really become a problem for me.  Not everyone is as adaptable to that kind of trip either because they need more human contact or because they are too shy to meet and have decent conversation with enough folks along the way.

I found that when travelling with my daughter and her college room mate we were well received and met lots of folks since we seemed to be a very non threatening family group.  When the group was two men I found that we had less interaction with the local folks.  So being alone can sometimes facilitate more rubbing elbows with the locals.

In general I find that if I am open and friendly the local folks respond with openness, friendliness, and generosity.

42
Routes / Re: Three weeks - Pacific Coast or Sierra Cascades
« on: January 09, 2016, 10:33:38 am »
For that time frame the Pacific Coast is the way to go.

It depends on how traffic tolerant you are, but I found the roads to be fine.  Some of it is fairly remote, at one point there were even free range cattle on the roadway.  The terrain is quite variable and interesting.

May can be pretty wet on the coast though.

I didn't care for the Washington portion of my Seattle to San Luis Obispo ride, but it was a relatively small part of the ride.

It probably isn't even an option at that time anyway, but I will say that the SC route is extremely challenging.  It is also very hard to pick a time and direction of travel that will not expose you to some pretty extreme temperatures.  We had 110+ F and overnight frost in the same 48 hour period.  We started in June in the south and still found services not yet open in most of Yosemite.  My guess would be that starting in the north would require an even later start, but I have only ridden the southern half S-N.

43
General Discussion / Re: Down Tube Shifters
« on: January 03, 2016, 08:45:54 am »
On the original question.  I like that they are simple, work well, are very reliable, and are out of the way.

Yes indeed, and that is their main disadvantage.  They are out of the way when you really need to get to them.
I think that there can be a few factors in that.  Compared to bar ends I find them about the same as far as ease of reaching them if not a little easier.  For me they are pretty much the same height as bar ends but further back.  That is at least in part because I ride a fairly small frame and have my bars pretty low.  Folks with larger frames and higher bars will see more difference.  The fact that I spent a lot of years using down tube shifters is a factor as well.

I have found that with bar ends I tend to bang them with my knee, again may not be an issues with a different frame or different cockpit setup.  Maybe a minor annoyance, but I also found that bar ends tended to get bumped out of gear when the bike was leaned against a wall, or railing.

44
Routes / Re: Safety of Southern Tier near Border
« on: January 02, 2016, 01:16:46 pm »
I didn't consider it especially dangerous when I rode it.

45
General Discussion / Re: Down Tube Shifters
« on: January 02, 2016, 01:14:52 pm »
Pete Staehling is the only person I've seen advocating for downtube shifters.
Not sure I exactly advocate for them, but I do like them pretty well myself.  I also like brifters quite well, but have a dislike of bar end shifters.

On the original question.  I like that they are simple, work well, are very reliable, and are out of the way.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 150