Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RussSeaton

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 33
31
General Discussion / Re: Cost of a cross country USA trip?
« on: December 23, 2015, 09:12:18 pm »
On my last long ride, Seattle to San Diego, the longest I went was 2 days without seeing a town. During those two days I ate a few Cup O' Noodles, a package of beef jerky and two cups of oatmeal.

[/quote]$10 was more than I ever spent for food in an entire day for myself in any of the previous 4 tours. I was averaging around $8/day for food.[/quote]

We must live in different worlds and galaxies.  Your two day menu would not get me from breakfast to lunch if I laid on the couch, let alone riding a bike all day.  I would have to be very frugal and cook all my own food all day long to make it on $10.  I eat a lot of processed, ready to eat foods while biking.  Usually bought at a convenience store.  So $10 might get me between breakfast and supper.  Plus another $10 for food cooked by me for breakfast and supper.

32
General Discussion / Re: Cost of a cross country USA trip?
« on: December 23, 2015, 04:02:25 pm »
Considering summits cost upwards of $40K I wish I'd taken that chance.

I don't think you should regret passing up the opportunity to climb Everest.  Yes it would be a memory that would last forever.  You could legitimately compare yourself with a straight face to Sir Edmund Hillary or Tenzing Norgay.  But the real risk of death is too great for Himalayan climbing.  I don't know the official death rate of climbers in the Himalayas but I would guess it is 2-3% or so.  Maybe more.  Imagine if riding your bike was that dangerous.  I ride 100+ rides each year of various lengths.  I would die twice every year if bike riding was as dangerous as Himalayan mountain climbing.  I would not ride a bike.

Now seeing Everest and the Himalayas and safely hiking around the area, I would do that with glee.  That would give me plenty of memories.  Let others get the climbing Everest memory.

33
General Discussion / Re: Cost of a cross country USA trip?
« on: December 22, 2015, 08:30:42 pm »
"Males ages 20 to 29 are the group most often being rescued in the national parks, according to park service data."
talked with her friend, the NPS ranger about rescues.
She confirmed the above data in spades. Just FYI.

Yes.  Nothing mysterious or unknown about that statement.  That group is the most carefree, reckless, unencumbered, risky.  And add to that the fact they have not lived or experienced enough of life to appreciate or recognize the dangers involved.  Its also pretty cheap and easy to get to national parks so poor young kids can do adventures there.  In contrast I would guess its mostly 40s and 50s who get in trouble at Mt. Everest because it takes a whole lot of money to climb Everest.  Older folks have more money than younger folks.

34
General Discussion / Re: bike vs. bike
« on: December 19, 2015, 10:23:04 pm »
Amongst my nine current bikes, they all ride well.  Stable, able to ride in a straight line with minimal input or attention from me.  Yet they are not sluggish or boring either.  They all ride right.  Even the touring bike when its fully loaded or unloaded.  I had a bike that was very twitchy, dangerous because it could not be ridden in a straight line.  Riding no hands was impossible.  It was a horrible handling bike.  I'd suggest test riding numerous bikes, not just touring but racing bikes as well.  Figure out what good handling is and most important, what awful handling is.  Then you can ride the touring bikes again and figure out which is best.

35
Gear Talk / Re: Thoughts on "fat-tired" touring bikes?
« on: December 13, 2015, 05:10:27 pm »
I believe it's ~358 miles are unpaved. As in ~174 is dirt like and ~184 gravel.

OK.  It looks like all of the gravel miles are the Katy trail in Missouri.  Which can be ridden with skinny road tires if dry.  Still recommend just avoiding all the unpaved sections if it is wet.  Find paved roads nearby if it is wet.

36
Gear Talk / Re: Drivetrain HELP
« on: December 12, 2015, 07:32:08 pm »
for a touring bike what's the perceived benefit for going with XT instead of mid line Shimano?

Perceived benefit.  Easy.  The top groups, XTR for mountain, Dura Ace for road, are better because they are lighter, higher quality, more expensive, prettier, nicer, etc.  Maybe, maybe it lasts longer too.  Maybe.  Higher groups may use bearings instead of bushings.  Maybe the higher groups have more advanced, newer features.  Maybe.  Higher groups may use more exotic material, titanium and carbon instead of aluminum or steel.  Within the Shimano lineup, they all work very well, last a long time, cost different.  Buy whichever you want.  They all work the same.

37
Gear Talk / Re: Drivetrain HELP
« on: December 10, 2015, 03:13:23 pm »
What it sounds like to me is 10 speed 42/32/24 but change the smallest ring to a 22. I could go with 11-34 rear cassette so everything should work.

Sounds just about perfect gearing for a loaded touring bike.  The 42x11 high gear may limit you to only achieving 56 mph down a mountain instead of the 58 mph you could achieve with a 44x11 high gear.  You will have to learn to live with that deficiency and overcome it somehow.  The 22 inner chainring will rarely see much use.  Unless you have steep hills around home or are in the mountains, you will never shift to the inner chainring.  The 32 middle ring and the bigger cassette cogs will allow you to climb pretty steep hills.  The inner ring is just an emergency, just in case gear.

38
Gear Talk / Re: Drivetrain HELP
« on: December 09, 2015, 01:13:03 pm »
I have 10 speed Shimano on my touring bike.  Triple crank.  I'd suggest going 10 speed cassette.  9 is slightly old, outdated, and the 10 works perfect.  So no rational reason not to have one more gear.  You are buying everything new, so get the newest, most up to date components.  As DaveB said, there are some compatibility issues between road STI shifters and MTB derailleurs and speeds.  I have some 105 STI 10 speed levers and a very cheap 9 speed Deore rear derailleur.  Might have cost all of $20 for the rear derailleur.  So its real easy and cheap to make things work right.

As for gearing choices, I like about a 4 to 1 high gear.  So 44 chainring and 11 cassette.  42x11 is also close enough.  Your 40 outer ring choice would not be my choice.  For the inner chainring, smallest possible no matter what.  For your cranks it is 22 tooth inner chainring.  64mm bolt circle diameter.  Its very easy and inexpensive to replace the inner ring on a crankset if the outer and middle are your preferred choice.  And biggest cassette cog possible, sort of, on the cassette.  Cassettes for 9 and 10 speed have either 32, 34, or 36 for the biggest cog.  32 and 34 will work with about all touring bikes no problem.  The 36 may be too big on some touring bikes.  Have to try it to find out.  The rear derailleur upper pulley will not be able to get under the 36 cog.  Likely due to the rear derailleur hanger not being long and low enough to allow the pulley to get under the cog.  Works for 32 and 34 big cogs, but not enough clearance for the bigger 36 cog.  But whether you have a 32, 34, or 36 big cog, does not matter because it amounts to about 1 gear inch difference between each.  Tiny.

39
Gear Talk / Re: Thoughts on "fat-tired" touring bikes?
« on: December 07, 2015, 08:24:20 pm »
The ACA recommends for the Lewis and Clark Trail "that you equip yourself with a fat-tired touring bicycle."

The route description says this:  "there are 174 miles of unpaved rail-trails and 184.3 miles of gravel, 24.5 of which are unavoidable if you stay on the main route."  Not sure if this means a total of 358 unpaved and gravel roads or if the 174 unpaved is part of the 184 gravel.  Route is a total of 3,143 miles going west.  So either 11% or 6% is unpaved.  Not much really.  All the rest is on paved roads.  I'd advise taking a bike and tires ideal for the 89% or 94% of the route, not the small unpaved portions.  Road bikes and skinny 28mm or 25mm tires do OK on gravel roads.  Wide 32mm or 35mm touring tires do even better on gravel roads.

I have been on a short section of the Katy trail near Columbia, Missouri.  It is very fine gravel/dust.  Not the big chunky gravel on country gravel roads.  If dry, road bikes and tires are probably the best choice for the Katy trail.  Better than mountain bikes.  If wet, then I'd suggest finding the paved roads that more or less parallel the Katy trail.

40
Gear Talk / Re: Front and Rear Racks Recommendation
« on: December 04, 2015, 12:31:46 pm »
I have the Nashbar $19.99 front low rider rack on my touring bike right now.  Works good.  Blackburn EX-1 rear rack on the touring bike.  Its $35 on Amazon.  Think its less today than what I paid for it 23 years ago.  Have used these racks for hundreds or thousands of miles of loaded touring.

41
Gear Talk / Re: Front and Rear Racks Recommendation
« on: December 03, 2015, 08:03:02 pm »
I have toured with a Blackburn Expedition rear rack, their heavy duty model.  And a Blackburn front low rider pannier rack.  Or a Nashbar front low rider rack.  All made with solid aluminum rods, welded together.  All work just fine.  Might have $60 or $70 into both racks on the bike now.  Plus some welding by my brother and cutting by me on the rear rack.  Had to make it fit the new bike.  Advantage of an aluminum rod rack.  If you know someone who can weld aluminum, you can easily modify it.

42
Routes / Re: Transam: solo or group ride? Has anyone done both?
« on: December 03, 2015, 01:02:17 pm »
My response might not apply to your questions.  In the USA we have many week long state rides.  Trucks haul the baggage.  Ride about 400 miles or so in seven days.  Tent camp every night, eat at restaurants or community food places.  You have the freedom to be as sociable or unsociable as you want on these rides.  You can ride with your family or friends everyday.  Side by side.  And set up tents right beside each other.  And eat every meal together and talk every night sitting around the beer coolers.  Or you can ride by yourself each day, there are thousands of riders so you are not really by yourself, and eat by yourself, and set up your tent on the other side of the campground, and not drink and talk with the others each night.  Your choice.

In the next year and a half before your ride, I'd suggest you find a similar ride in the UK and ride it.  Maybe invite friends or family to join you.  Then decide how you are going to ride the event.  And you can change your plan too.  Be with and around everyone all the time.  Or be by yourself one day and then with everyone the next.  Or ride alone each day and then be the social butterfly at camp and supper every night.  Figure out whether you like being/riding with people or alone.

43
General Discussion / Re: Cyclocross Bike for Southern Tier
« on: December 01, 2015, 10:41:29 pm »
As to the one question on my existing road bike. Its a Cannondale CAAD8 and I've had it for about 10 years. It's aluminum with carbon fork. I rode it recently on the North Carolina Mountain to Coast ride and did NOT feel safe or comfortable.

I happen to own a CAAD7 and a CAAD9 bike.  Aluminum frames and carbon forks.  I consider them to be some of the best bikes ever built.  They have no flaws.  Did Cannondale somehow make a horrible CAAD8 bike in between the great CAAD7 and CAAD9 bikes?  I'd suggest you figure out why you do not feel safe or comfortable on a likely great CAAD8 bike before wasting money on a new bike.  You do not have bike problems, you have other problems.

44
General Discussion / Re: Cyclocross Bike for Southern Tier
« on: November 30, 2015, 10:56:38 pm »
I'll give an answer on your wheel question.  None of the ones you mentioned.  I prefer normal wheels built at home or the local shop using regular hubs such as the Shimano road or mountain bike hubs.  And regular spokes with brass nipples such as DT or Sapim or Wheelsmith.  And regular rims made by many companies.  More spokes the better.  36 is ideal but 32 is OK.  Any fewer spokes and you are taking chances with no benefits.  Are you racing to the top of the Alps with your 16 spoke lightweight front wheel?  Are you racing the World Championship time trial with your deep aerodynamic wheels and 12 spokes?  No, so why not use wheels with more spokes that are stronger and can be adjusted easily if an accident occurs.  The advantage of regular built wheels is the hubs are the best quality and easily serviceable on the road if needed.  Spokes are available from every bike shop or mail order every day of the week.  Rims can be replaced pretty easily if they fail.  The wheels you mentioned and all like them have too few spokes for weight or rough riding, and have difficult to find parts.  They may be lighter, but so what.

45
General Discussion / Re: Surly LHT/Disc Trucker
« on: November 28, 2015, 06:01:43 pm »
(meaning you won't be told that square taper bottom brackets are no longer made or that they are, but just basic, inexpensive ones).  I built up Surly Trolls for my wife and me.

I'll admit I was surprised Sugino still makes square taper cranks.  I have not heard of Sugino since the mid 1980s.  Did not even know they still existed.  As for the ones Surly uses on its complete bikes.  They are some Chinese company I have never heard of.  Shimano abandoned square tapers on its upper models in the late 1990s or so.  They may still make square taper cranks for the cheapest bikes they equip.  But not on the upper levels.  I have several Dura Ace square taper cranks.  And Campagnolo square taper cranks.  All over 15 years old.  Not sure I would recommend someone build up a bike using parts 15 or more years old.  Just like I would not recommend someone build up a bike using 7 or 8 speed parts.  The biking world has moved on.

Not sure how square taper bottom brackets can use larger bearings than Shimano Hollowtech.  Square taper bottom brackets go inside the bottom bracket shell on the frame.  Its a tube about 1.375" diameter.  Hollowtech shells are about 1.875" diameter.  About half inch larger because the Hollowtech shells that hold the bottom bracket bearings are outside the frame's bottom bracket tube, which is about 1.375" diameter.  With the larger Hollowtech shell you end up with more and bigger bearings.  But anyway, bottom brackets are fairly durable and rarely give any problems.  The problem with square taper sealed bottom brackets is there are not many or any higher end cranks built for them anymore.  The Sugino mentioned above are probably nice.  I have good memories of Sugino from about 30 years ago.

Jan Heine, the link you provided, runs a magazine and a bicycle parts company.  A company that sells the square taper bottom brackets you are fond of.  He might have a vested interest.  Kind of like when a bike magazine recommends a bike and then you see advertisements in the magazine from that same bike brand.  Makes you wonder if the magazine selling advertisements to the bike company can be trusted to do an objective review of the bike.  They are paid by the bike company.

You say you are a Surly owner.  Do you know anything about Surly?  Surly is a brand name created by QBP.  QBP is the largest bike parts distributor in the US.  QBP is based in Minneapolis.  QBP supplies all the stuff to your local bike shop.  QBP saw an opportunity in the biking world.  People were fond of old biking parts for some reason.  Not sure why because old bike parts never worked as nicely as newer parts.  But QBP wanted to capitalize on this fondness people had for the old days.  So they created the Surly brand.  All Surly stuff is made in China.  QBP has many contacts in China because they import all the stuff they distribute from China.  QBP knows China very well.  QBP had Surly bike frames made in China from cheap Chinese steel.  China is a huge steel producer.  Hopefully QBP monitors closely the Chinese factories making the Surly frames.  QBP can sell its Surly frames pretty cheaply in the US because it makes them very cheaply in China and still make a good profit.  Good business plan.  QBP already distributes to every bike shop in the US so they have the distribution network already established.  Sell Surly frames and parts to the same shops they already serve.  QBP saw the niche for old style nostalgic bike parts and they filled it with the Surly brand creation.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 33