Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - aggie

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 25
Rocky Mountain / Re: utah cliffs loop
« on: February 15, 2010, 02:51:52 pm »
If you purchase the download pdf version it has all the detail that their regular "paper" maps have.  You will need this detail since the route uses some poorly marked roads and trails.  The route is about 50% off road.  Some of the off road sections are a hard packed dirt but some have some loose sand and gravel.

Gear Talk / Re: Baggy shorts
« on: February 05, 2010, 01:38:22 pm »
I use the REI Novara Rail bike shorts.  They have a nice liner with pad and several pockets to carry stuff when exploring off the bike.

Gear Talk / Re: What road bikes can fit a 700x32 or 35?
« on: January 31, 2010, 02:16:10 am »
It really depends on the bike/manufacturer.  Many road bike are really designed for speed so they expect the riders to be using "skinny" tires.  I would say that most will take upto a 25mm tire and a few may go to 28mm.  However you may need to actually see the bike to tell if it will take a 32 or 35.  I'd say few road bikes would handle that size.  A cross bike which is a type of road bike should handle the size you want.

GPS Discussion / Re: Best GPS
« on: January 30, 2010, 11:47:35 am »
I didn't use waypoints.  I used the ACA maps.  The gps was great when you go off the ACA route page.  I could find services that weren't listed on the route guide and then find my way back to the route if necessary.  I could also display a good sized map so if I could remember several turns I could see when I was there.  This was especially nice for areas where the roads weren't well marked.

I now carry a small net book and I have another map program on it so I can look at it at night to see what's on the route ahead or if I want to take another detour.

I always carry maps.  Anything electronic could fail and "paper" maps are my insurance I'll be able to find my way.

Routes / Re: X-Country Route w/ the Easiest Grades
« on: January 30, 2010, 02:00:31 am »
A modified Southern Tier route may be an option.  In many areas if you follow the interstate you will have the most moderate grades to climb.  I can't remember the grade coming out of San Diego so you may want to check it out before you ride it. 

You may also want to take a look at some topo maps of the states the route goes through.  This may help you route yourself around and steep inclines.

GPS Discussion / Re: Best GPS
« on: January 29, 2010, 11:44:17 am »
I've used a Garmin 705 on several tours and it has worked just fine.  I get about 12 hours of battery life between charges.  I use either a solar powered recharger, a battery powered recharger, or plug in recharger depending on the situation.  The same chargers also recharge my phone.  It's a personal preference and I like being able to do a search for services (hotel, food, bike shop, etc) in areas I'm not familiar.  A gps is just like any other piece of equipment on a bike - some will love it and some will hate it. 

Gear Talk / Re: 10 speed vs 9 speed for touring
« on: January 28, 2010, 07:46:21 pm »
Building a bike is a series of compromises: money, functionality, durability, riding style, etc.  I've had a bike with bar end shifters but I prefer the STI style.  When I built my current touring bike I wanted the Dura Ace shifters and a mountain bike drive-train.  Shimano had stopped making the 9 speed and all I could get was the 10 speed.  Initially I had a 9 speed cassette even though the shifters were 10 speed but with some adjusting it worked just fine.  Occasionally I would have to double shift because of the difference but since I don't wait until the last second to shift it worked just fine.  Later a different bike shop recommended the 10 speed IRD cassette that offered the gear range I was looking for as Shimano wasn't making a 34 tooth gear.  (SRAM XX has a 32 or 36 tooth cassette.)  I decided to give it a try and so far it has been working without any major problems (my only "problem" is my rear wheel breaking spokes).  I'm also 200+ pounds and I'm too old to try to mash gears going uphill.

One bike mechanic recommended that I lube my chain at night.  This give the lubricant a chance to "dry" so it picks up less grit.  Less grit on the chain means less wear which means longer life.  So far this advice has extended the life of my current chain. 

Gear Talk / Re: 10 speed vs 9 speed for touring
« on: January 28, 2010, 03:42:39 pm »
SRAM is making their xx line which is designed for cross riders (I meant SRAM XX instead of FSA in the post above).  As this is a 10 speed set up they have a chain designed for it. 

I'm currently using the Shimano 10 speed chain and haven't had any problems.  I tow a Bob with about 40 lbs of gear.  I do change the chain more often than I did on my regular road bike.  I change it about every 2k miles.  I'm not riding any single track and so far it has been very dependable.

I opted for the Deore xt drive set up when building the bike.  It helps that the cranks are a little further apart than a traditional road bike set up (I avoid the bow legged pedal stroke = less wear and tear on knees).  Plus I have the triple crank with a small gear that combined with the 34 tooth rear cassette allows me to spin while climbing.  I don't use it often but it is sure nice when I'm going up an 8% grade.  I'm very happy with the set up and other than the minor adjustment issue it has performed great.

Gear Talk / Re: 10 speed vs 9 speed for touring
« on: January 28, 2010, 11:23:59 am »
I have the IRD cassette with Shimano shifters (Dura Ace).  The rear derailler is the Deore XT (big enough to handle a 34).  So far it works fine and provides me a very low gear (triple crank) to climb any steep hills.  The adjustment is a little sensitive.  As the cable stretches, down shifting (larger gear) in the middle gears takes a little bit of time.  It is temporarily fixed by the barrel adjusters but I find the best "fix" is to take it to a bike shop and have them fine tune the shifting.  No problem with the cassette. 

I would like to try the FSA XX cassette but was told that you had to have the whole package for it to work properly. 

Routes / Re: LA to SF in Feb?
« on: January 27, 2010, 02:47:26 pm »
This is the rainy season.  Fronts come down from the Gulf of Alaska so they are cold and wet.  Generally the wind is from the north but during this time they could come from the south when a low pressure zone brings in the cold and rain.  This definitely not the tourist season so road traffic will generally be only locals.  It is also possible that parts of the route nearer to SF could be closed due to slides.  When you get to Cambria check with CalTrans to see if HWY 1 is closed anywhere along the route.

I just checked the web site and there is a slide about three miles south of Gorda.  The road is still open but be prepared for delays and construction equipment in the area.

General Discussion / Re: where can i find cyclist "WHITE" pages???
« on: January 23, 2010, 06:32:23 pm »
Take a look at at  This may be what you are looking for.

General Discussion / Re: Best Cell phone coverage across US???
« on: January 22, 2010, 02:34:14 pm »
I had good coverage with Verizon when I've done the Southern Tier and the Western Express in Nevada.  In Nevada I had service when others who had other companies couldn't get a signal.  However, there were some areas that I didn't have service.  Langtry, TX is an example.

Routes / Re: Texas and Eastern 1/2 of Souther Tier in Summer?
« on: January 21, 2010, 12:33:46 pm »
I did Texas and Louisiana this past summer when they had record breaking heat.  It was hot and humid but not unrideable.  You should expect some mosquitoes and a few thundershowers but it is definitely doable.  Go for it.  You'll have a great ride.

Routes / Re: Western Express - NV - early June
« on: January 20, 2010, 02:26:55 pm »
One thing I forgot to mention is the climbing on Hwy 50.  Nevada has a lot of mountain ranges.  In between towns you may see several ranges and basins.  This web site gives you and idea of the climbing you'll do between towns -  Depending on the distance you travel each day you could have over 4000 feet of climbing that day.

Routes / Re: Chicago to west coast?
« on: January 18, 2010, 01:23:50 pm »
35 days might be a bit ambitious.  If you use ACA maps your shortest route may be to connect to the Great Rivers going south and connect to the Trans Am going west.  Then take the Western Express to SF.  It looks to be the most direct and have the most variety of scenery.  I'd guess it to be about 3000 miles so if you take a few days off you will average close to 100 miles per day of riding.

You could also connect to the Norther Tier.  It may be about the same mileage.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 25