Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - briwasson

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12
16
Gear Talk / Re: Chain repair
« on: September 07, 2012, 06:37:48 am »
For anyone who uses master links, I highly recommend getting  a Park MLP-1C tool for home use. It makes removal so much easier than doing it with just your hands.

http://www.parktool.com/product/master-link-pliers-mlp-1

17
Gear Talk / Re: Chain repair
« on: September 06, 2012, 04:06:08 pm »
I've used SRAM master links with Shimano 9-speed chains for several years with no problems. Officially you are supposed to use the Shimano one-time use pins when rejoining a chain, but I never use them.

By the way, I use the setup above on both my single touring bikes as well as my tandem and triplet, all run with wide-range gearing and a lot of stress, especially on the tandem and triplet.

18
Routes / Re: GAP/C&O Canal - Alternative Roadway Routes
« on: September 05, 2012, 02:00:24 pm »
If you are staying in Leesburg one night, then taking the W&OD path would certainly be an option worth considering. The two times I've ridden on the C&O, the section from Whites Ferry to Great Falls has had some of the worst trail conditions of the entire trail. But, the W&OD will add extra miles to the route compared with riding the C&O. It's mitigated by the fact that it is paved the entire way. We did a short tour one Memorial Day weekend a few years back where we parked at Great Falls, rode to Leesburg via the C&O, stayed the night there, and rode back via the W&OD.

BTW, we had a very good experience staying at the Best Western in Leesburg on that trip. We stayed for two nights and they were very accommodating (pardon the pun), allowing us to store our tandem and Burley child trailer inside in an empty conference room.

I assume you saw my mapped on-road route from Williamsport to Antietam on my trip report?

19
Routes / Re: ACA Denali route?
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:40:22 pm »
The "not camping" part is what may prove challenging as you plan your trip. A lot of the lodging infrastructure now in Alaska is built by and for the big tour/cruise companies, and tends to cluster around sights or stopping points convenient to their buses. They also can fill up quickly based on what tours are there.

That leaves you basically with lodges and b&bs. Lodges can be very "rustic" or great, it depends which ones you are at. Also, don't judge a lodge by the outside. I've seen ones that look great outside be kind of dismal inside, and vice versa. B&Bs can be anything from a room in a mobile home (seriously) to a "normal" b&b. When researching options, be sure to ask probing questions!

The general lack of lots of lodging options makes it important to pre-book if you want to be assured of a bed each night. This is challenging, though, to do on a bike trip, especially in a place like Alaska where the weather can impact a day's plans to such a great degree. With long distances between services, you don't have too many options if a place you were planning on staying is filled up.

I don't say this to discourage you at all. Alaska is beautiful! Just be aware that you probably will have to prebook most every night and lose some flexibility that camping might otherwise allow.

20
Routes / Re: civil war routes on virginia??
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:25:29 pm »
Depending where in Virginia you are looking, there are lots of possibilities. In the Shenandoah Valley, for example, there are tons of Civil War battlefields and related sites. You could pretty much just follow Rt. 11 north/south to hit some of them (it parallels I-81), like New Market, for example. Even without the history, it's a pretty area. Just got back from there yesterday for a Labor Day camping trip to Shenandoah Nat Park.

Then, up near Strasburg, swing east toward DC and take in the sites closer to DC like Bull Run, Manassas, etc.

If you can go a bit farther afield, the C&O canal route offers access to some "big" Civil War sites, like Antietam and Harper's Ferry.

21
Routes / Re: GAP/C&O Canal - Alternative Roadway Routes
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:19:17 pm »
We rode part of the GAP on our triplet (three-seat tandem) with panniers last year, from Ohiopyle to Cumberland. We were fine with 700x35 tires front/rear. Since a triplet is generally much heavier that a tandem, you should be fine on the GAP from our experience. We did have some wet weather on the trip, but not heavy rains. We did notice the triplet sinking a bit more into the trail surface after a rain, but it wasn't too bad. Plus, I'm sure you will be a lot lighter then we were (loaded with all of us I'm guessing we were over 550 pounds between bike, people and bags).

I've also ridden the GAP and C&O on my single bike with 26x1.25 inch road tires (approximately 35mm) and it was also fine.

On my C&O ride, I detoured off the towpath several times just for variety and to see some of the area beyond the "green tunnel" of the towpath. I detailed them on my trip report on the Crazy Guy site at http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/cando-tour. My GAP trip report is also linked from there; see http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/briwasson

Beware that the surrounding countryside of both the GAP and C&O can be very hilly, especially around the GAP.

22
Just got back from a tour along the Danube bike route from Passau to Vienna, and I have an as-new Bikeline guidebook for sale. It's the newest version (bought it two weeks ago in Passau, Germany) and is the version in English, covering the section noted above. It cost 13 euros (a bit over $16 USD at current rates). I'll sell for $11.50 shipped (in the USA via Media Mail) and throw in any free advice you want. I've biked this route several times now and know it fairly well.

This book is difficult to impossible to find in the USA, but is really the premier guide to this route. The route is also known as the "Donauradweg" in German, for keyword purposes.

23
Classifieds / Re: Great deals ! Hope I'm in the right place !
« on: July 09, 2012, 01:30:48 pm »
Hmmm, not sure how many folks tour on Zipp carbon wheels and a Di2 groupset...

24
Routes / Re: ACA roads to avoid in the Adirondacks?
« on: April 25, 2012, 07:59:07 am »
Thanks to each for taking time to respond. We are more confident in the route now. Still, google maps bike routing has a very tantalizing route from Speculator to Sarasota Springs, via Edinburg and it allows us to schedule a nice short day on the bike and a bit more time hanging out.
Thanks again.

Commenting on the route Google Maps takes you on from Speculator to Wells (using bike routing): Gilmantown Rd. is a very pretty road through mostly unpopulated areas. BUT, beware that it is gravel/dirt most of the way after you turn off Shore Rd. "Gilmantown" shown on the map is not really a town, but just a collection of small houses/cottages by the lake. No services there that I know of.

I would recommend sticking to Rt. 30 from Speculator to Wells. It doesn't get much traffic and it's a really pretty ride following the Sacandaga River the whole way into Wells. Plus, it's almost all downhill -- I'm talking NICE downhill -- and has good shoulders. You'll have a smile on your face the entire way. At least I did the couple of times I've biked it.

25
Routes / Re: ACA roads to avoid in the Adirondacks?
« on: April 23, 2012, 08:46:09 am »
I haven't ridden AC's ADK route, but I have spent time in the Speculator area (and have biked around there) as well as elsewhere in the Adirondacks. The Adirondacks are pretty sparsely populated, and even "major" roads are not all that busy. From Speculator to Edinburg, for example, you are pretty much reliant on using Rt. 30. It's actually a very pretty ride for the most part (and almost all downhill from Speculator to Wells, for example).

The only time the roads really seem to get busy in the summer is on the weekend, and in particular, Saturday, when the weekly visitors are coming and going.

26
In Germany the ADFC – Allgemeiner Deutscher Fahrradclub - has 130,000 members.

http://www.adfc.de/ueber-uns/ziele-des-adfc/adfc-daten-kurz-und-knackig

27
General Discussion / Re: Liability
« on: March 25, 2012, 05:30:24 pm »
Do some research on the concept of "Common Adventure" or "Common Adventurer." This concept, popularized by university outing programs, some outdoor clubs, etc., basically says that "we're all in this together as an adventure," and that no one person is the leader. It is designed to address liability issues. I can't speak on how well it does, or does not, protect you, but it's worth looking at.

28
Yes, it is possible to create your own travel case, either at the airport or before you get there. I've done it on two occasions. See below for more details.

I have a couple of S&S single bikes (Co-Motions), and a Santana S&S tandem and S&S triplet. Yes, I like them! But, more to the point, I've traveled a lot with them. Usually I use the S&S Backpack cases, but I also own an S&S hard case. Coupled bikes aren't for everyone, and they do add to the cost, but I disagree with DaveB in that IMO they are much more likely to pay for themselves now than in the past, now that airlines are charging very hefty fees to fly bikes. But that's another discussion, and one that's been hashed over many times elsewhere.

Let's get to your original question!

Anyway... several years ago we were planning a two-week tour in Europe with our tandem. As part of the trip we'd fly in/out of Munich, but add another one-way flight leg from Munich to our start point. To enable this I took a cardboard bike box and cut it down/fabricated it to the standard S&S case size of 26x26x10, and put it inside the hard case. I rolled up some corrugated cardboard into a few tubes that were 10" in order to act like the "compression members" that S&S sells. The idea was that once we got to Munich, we'd simply pull the cardboard "case" out of the hard case, store our hard case at the airport and then continue on using the cardboard box for the next (one-way) leg. As it turned out, we had to change plans once we landed at MUC and I never used the box for what I intended, but I have no doubt that it would have been fine. I still  have it in the loft in my garage ready to use at some point. S&S actually makes a nylon cover they call the "box cover," designed for just this sort of use. It weighs 2 pounds and costs $50. I guess it would provide a bit more protection for the box, but it doesn't really seem necessary. But it shows that the cardboard box idea is something that S&S explicity endorses, as they sell their own version. http://www.sandsmachine.com/ac_box.htm

The short of it: get a cardboard bike box, cut it down to 26x26x10, and then just pack your bike in it like a regular S&S case. Get lots of heavy duty packing tape and use it liberally to strengthen the box. Depending where you are, find some cheap foam pipe insulation to protect your bike tubes, or wrap liberally with newspaper or the like.

Alternately, if you have access to a home store like Home Depot in the USA or Obi in Germany, you can make a simple box using 1/4 plywood (underlayment) and 1x10 dimensional pine wood (which is actually 9-1/4 x 3/4) to construct your own "legal size" box. Pay them (they charge $1 a cut or something like that) to cut the plywood and 1x10 to size and then simply nail or screw it together and you are good to go. I bet if you go off-hours and are nice to them, they might even let you use some tools; otherwise get a cheap hammer and some finish nails, or a screwdriver and some drywall screws. Cost? Probably $20 or so in materials and an hour or so of time to construct. Pick up some pipe insulation while you are there for $1 a piece. You'd need two panels at 26x26, two 1x10s at 26" and two 1x10s at 24.5" to keep in size.

I made something along these lines for the center section of my S&S Santana Cabrio triplet in order to take it on a plane. The center section is not designed to fit in an S&S bag, so in order to get it on the flight with no extra charges I had to figure something out. It's a bit more complicated than what I suggested above due to the nature of the frame section, but it will give you an idea of what I'm talking about. Here's a link to the BF thread with pictures if you are interested:

http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php/712897-Photos-custom-crate-for-Santana-Cabrio-center-section?highlight=santana+cabrio

29
Using a Deore FD with your 105 STI levers probably won't work. As others have noted, road levers have a different FD cable pull than MTB levers. A road FD like an Ultegra or Tiagra will work fine with the Deore cranks and chainrings you mention. It won't be quite as crisp-shifting as if you were using a road crank and stock rings, but will work fine. I have this setup on three of my bikes (Ultegra STI levers, Ultegra or Dura Ace FD, and 48-36-24 chainrings) and have no problems with it.

Look on Ebay for a used Ultegra triple FD and run that. Either get one with an integrated clamp or get a "braze-on" style model and a separate clamp to fit your seat tube.

30
9-speed Ultegra and 105 STI left levers will handle both double and triple cranks by default. The 9-speed Dura-Ace STIs do come in separate versions, though. I'm not sure whether Tiagra STIs can handle both.

You've mentioned using your left front STI Shimano 105 shifter to shift a triple crankset.  It shifts a compact double crankset now.  I'm not so sure Shimano STI can shift both double and triple.  Shimano makes unique double and triple STI shifters in Ultegra and 105 models.  So I'm questioning whether your crankset change will be as smooth as you are implying.  I think you will need a new left STI shifter for the triple crankset.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12