Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Old Guy New Hobby

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
Gear Talk / Re: Surly Disc Trucker v. LHT
« on: July 03, 2013, 08:43:32 pm »
It's not cheap.

Gear Talk / Re: Surly Disc Trucker v. LHT
« on: July 03, 2013, 08:04:59 am »
I wonder where I could find that matching tape?

Gear Talk / Re: Touring crankset
« on: June 27, 2013, 07:59:25 pm »
The person has a 11-32 cassette.  A 22x32 low gear is 18.2 gear inches.  A 24x32 low gear is 19.9 gear inches.  If you think you can tell a 1.7 gear inch difference in a gear, you're living in a fantasy world.

My granny gear is 17.9 gear inches. There are times when I'm glad to have it. It all depends on what you want.

Gear Talk / Re: Chain Maintenance vs Replacement
« on: June 22, 2013, 02:19:15 pm »
I mostly just apply Boesheild T9 liberally, spin the pedals a few minutes, and wipe it off.

This. Except I apply one drop per joint. A small tube of Boeshield lasts a long, long time.

Gear Talk / Re: newbie saddle question
« on: June 21, 2013, 08:03:11 am »
Everybody's different, and there's no area where differences are larger than with saddles and shorts.

What do you call a comfortable saddle? I prefer saddles that don't have gel cushioning. I want most of my weight on my sitz bones. The cushioning spreads the weight to areas that aren't good at absorbing it. Narrow saddles are good because they minimize chaffing. Padded shorts is matter of personal preference. Yesterday I rode more than 7 hours with compression underwear and a pair of athletic shorts. I also have padded shorts, but at the end of the day, I don't feel any difference when I wear the padding.

Gear Talk / Re: B-17 with Aerotech Bibs
« on: May 29, 2013, 11:11:52 am »
I rode a Brooks for a year with no problem. Suddenly I started getting abrasion on my thigh.  I found I had set the saddle with the nose a little to high. I leveled the saddle and haven't had a problem since. I sit pretty far back on the saddle, which keeps my weight on my sitz bones where I want it.

I'm pretty sure your issue has nothing to do with the proofide. That helps the saddle conform to your sitz bones more quickly.

The Brooks has an awesome reputation. I love mine and wouldn't change it. But there is no such thing as a saddle for everybody. If you like the Italia Max Flight, why not use that?

the bottom bottle cage (under the down tube) can't accommodate a normal sized water or fuel bottle because the geometry is so compact.

That's true of a lot of bikes, especially if you like fenders and large tires. I have a Trek 520, and use that spot for my pump.

Gear Talk / Re: ACA & Smartphones
« on: April 24, 2013, 08:17:03 pm »
slowandslower and staehpj1 bring up interesting points. But comparing GPS battery life with the GPS on full time to smart phone battery life with the phone off or in standby is not kosher. Likewise comparing the sturdiness of a naked GPS to a phone in an expensive protective case. With capacitance touch screens, weather protection can mean the inability to register screen taps. And purchasing a phone-based mapping program adds cost to the smart phone. Still, I would be interested in hearing the experiences of those who use a smart phone as their primary navigation device -- both the good points and the challenges they faced.

Technology changes fast.

+1 to that. GPS manufactures better pay attention, because their units have some significant disadvantages, especially in the are of screen readability and the ability to communicate with computers in a reasonable manner. I do believe that the $25 Raspberry Pi has more processing power than most GPS units. Also, the PC software Garmin offers to support their GPS units is so difficult to use that I gave up trying to use it long ago. One gets the idea that Garmin's main concern is the Digital Rights Management of their maps. I don't mean to pick on Garmin. The others are probably about the same. It's just that my experience is with Garmin.

Gear Talk / Re: ACA & Smartphones
« on: April 23, 2013, 08:59:26 am »
Maybe I'm missing something or maybe I just don't get it. There are a lot of rugged, weatherproof, water resistant GPS devices available. Their batteries easily last 2 days of hard riding. Prices can get up there, but a dedicated GPS generally maxes out at half the real price of a smart phone.

On the other hand, a smart phone has limited battery life, would be severely damaged in a good rain, and would likely get a cracked screen if it ever fell off the bike, or even if the cyclist took a tumble. The bicycle phone mounts I have seen look suspect. Most of the mapping and routing options are web-based, which requires significant data use. Of course, this last point is not important if one already has a hefty data plan for other purposes. (I don't.) Even without the cost of the data plan, the value of web-based services is limited when no cell signal is available, as can happen on tour.

Having a phone on a tour is important. I own one phone, which is a smart phone. But it is a bit of a pain due to my desire to protect it. To answer the phone, I have to pull over, open the water proof handlebar bag, unzip the pocket, pull the phone out, and punch the screen. My chances of answering a call are about 50 - 50. Most times, I would rather continue the ride and look at the voice mail later on.

Being a technology enthusiast and a cycling enthusiast can be a lot of fun. There are great synergies available. But sometimes the combination just doesn't make sense, at least to me.

Gear Talk / Re: Rack mounted tail lights
« on: April 07, 2013, 11:50:56 am »
I think the best rear blinky sold is the Planet  Bike Super Flash Turbo. Its 1-W LED is visible in all lighting conditions. The battery is good for at least 2 days of hard riding with eneloop rechargeables. You have to buy the rack bracket separately. I have never, ever had a motorist fail to notice me.

Gear Talk / Re: Camping Gas/stove
« on: March 23, 2013, 04:30:53 pm »
Another handy use for white gas is starting campfires singing your eyebrows off (or worse).

Your welcome for the correction. ;-)

Gear Talk / Re: Choosing the cycling pants for the first time
« on: March 05, 2013, 06:39:56 pm »
This is necessary not only for building your leg strength, but also for building endurance in your butt, back, neck, triceps, etc.

It's not only building your body, but also training your body. The way you sit, pedal, and ride has a huge influence on how much discomfort you experience in various parts of your body -- much larger, in fact, than the type of clothing or saddle you use. You can read advice about keeping your back straight, using your core to keep weight off your hands, moving around, etc. But the only way to actually learn these skills is to ride, and build your distance slowly.

Gear Talk / Re: Touring bikes...
« on: February 18, 2013, 06:29:15 pm »
When I went to buy mine, I was fortunate to have a shop nearby that had several different touring bikes in stock. When test riding, I found that one was way too twitchy for me. The specs were great. And it might well be a great bike for someone else. But it definitely wasn't the bike for me.  I only knew from the test ride.

If you decide you will buy in the US, you must decide whether you will test ride in Sweden, knowing you have already decided not to buy the bike from that shop.

If you buy in the US, you might want to plan a couple of days test riding near the shop before taking off across country. Any bike can have a manufacturer's defect. Any shop can make a mistake assembling the bike. A problem might not be detected until you load it up and hit the road.

No matter how heavy or light your gear, your bike will end up taking quite a pounding during your tour. I'm partial to steel frames because I think they do the best job of handling bumps in the road.

Gear Talk / Re: Handlebar bag for wing-style carbon handlebar.
« on: January 21, 2013, 07:46:22 pm »
The Ortlieb website specificly says not to use their cable system with fiber bars.

My bad. Sorry.

Gear Talk / Re: Brooks B67
« on: January 20, 2013, 01:19:53 pm »
I agree with pdlamb. Further, I think the gel seats are the wrong way to go. The body is made to put weight on the sitz bones. Any saddle that helps you do that is doing the right thing. (That includes the Brooks.) Finally, keep in mind that the rider should be active on the bike. Keep some of the weight on your feet. Move around. Get out of the saddle occasionally. Or maybe you really want a recumbent?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8