Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - dombrosk

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
Gear Talk / Re: Changing a Rohloff Wheel
« on: November 20, 2011, 09:13:58 am »
For me it's a lot easier to take off a rear wheel with my Rohloff...

...some people seem to be able to thread their chain onto that rear derailleur without cursing, but not I.  But my Rohloff just involves loosening a couple of thumbscrews and the wheel just slides out.

I'll be posting a longer comment into a thread I started back in the spring, but short version: if you're thinking of a Rohloff I'd recommend getting it.

General Discussion / Re: Whitefish, MT lodging
« on: October 13, 2011, 06:36:10 am »
When I went through Whitefish on the Northern Tier a few years ago I stayed at the Super-8.  I'd been camping in the rain for about a week and made good use of the guest laundry!   The motel is a bit south of downtown, more of a short bike ride than a walk.  I was able to wheel my bike right into the room, always a plus.

There were places closer to the train station and downtown that looked more expensive.  I have fond memories of a visit to Glacier Cyclery, a great bike shop near the train station.  Happy travels!

Gear Talk / Re: info overload, help!
« on: September 12, 2011, 06:56:51 am »
Lots of good advice already here... I want to focus on three things.

First,  the 5' 9" height angle.

Happens to be my height also, and for bicycles that can be a tricky fit situation, especially if you want an upright riding position.  I really wanted a Surley LHT, but couldn't make it work with an upright riding position due to a tall stand-over height (painful combination with short legs).  For a few years I toured in a modified Surley Cross-Check, but while the stand-over height was good, the frame geometry was a bit too 'lively' for me, I wanted more stability for touring.

Stand-over height is a frame dimension which most cyclists don't need to worry about... but it can eliminate a lot of frames for those of us with a certain size shape.

Next, the 650B issue.

Not unrelated to the height.  Turns out that Surley LHT's come in 700c and 26" frame sizes, and I am kind of perfectly in-between those two.  If I were shorter, the 26" LHT would be great.  If I were taller... but actually I've reached the age where my height is dropping and my shoe size is increasing!

I looked for 650B bikes, and was struck by the Yves Gomez by Rivendell, because another part of getting older is finding a step-through frame really helpful.  But my local bike shop employs a young man who's just starting out as a framebuilder, so I asked him to build me a custom 650B mixte frame... after 6 months of commuting and a 700 mile tour in Europe it's still my favorite bike ever. 

Here's a photo of the bike:

Finally, for us no-longer spring chickens... buying a bike is a bit different when you are trying to adapt to an aging body while also considering the possibility that this may be your last bike purchase.  For me that meant designing a frame that could adjust to an increasingly upright riding position and a step-through mount.  It also meant spending more money to get exactly what I wanted.  At a certain point it doesn't make a lot of sense to wait for 'later'.

Happy shopping and happy touring!

Gear Talk / Re: RX Cycling Sunglasses
« on: September 05, 2011, 10:48:50 am »
I'd echo the positive comments on Rudy Project... I've had Rudy Project glasses with prescription bi-focal inserts for eight or so years now... love them and had my optician make the prescription inserts (and remake them when my RX changed.)  Many 'Rudy's" take RX implants, so I'd get to a bike shop that carries them if you can and try on a bunch.  I found huge differences in comfort and one that was immediately 'right' --- only trying them on would have done that for me.

The biggest advantage I've found with this style of sport glasses is keeping wind/dust out of my eyes.  Also, the Rudy lens material is somehow hydrophobic and easy to wipe clean in the rain even with a wet glove.

For lenses, I'd avoid any kind of 'transition' lens.... my choices are:

Red - daily riding... oddly enough they cut the glare but make it easier to see in the shade.
Yellow - rainy day riding.... make every day a sunny day.
Dark grey- open prairie / alpine / snow
Clear / Smoked - just eye protection for headlight riding

They are expensive, but if you get 10 years plus of use, the expense is worth it to me.

Gear Talk / Re: clean hydration pack
« on: September 01, 2011, 08:26:49 pm »
There's an old saying that everybody 'eats a peck of dirt' in their life.

For whatever it's worth, I've been on quite a few monthlong tours with a camelbak that I shook out and refilled every day without ever cleaning or drying it.

Your results may vary, but it's possible that advertising has made us bacteria-phobic.

General Discussion / Re: Bicycle Security
« on: May 08, 2011, 11:37:09 am »
We've recently had two active threads on this topic, "bike locks" and "bicycle security".  Folks interested in the topic might want to look through both threads.

Seems like there are three approaches to locking up:

1) completely unlocked.
I'll do this on a charity ride when I'm surrounded by lots of unlocked bikes much nicer than mine.  Aside from that I avoid this approach, partially because a neighbor of mine had a bad experience trusting small towns during his Northern Tier ride.  (He published a journal of his ride, A Crossing by Brian Newhouse) 

I was concerned when one poster to this forum advised going unlocked in major cities... this advice seemed very unwise to me:
 "Re: Bike locks
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2011, 01:48:36 pm »  My touring has been in Europe and the USA.  I'm not sure I took a lock on any of my tours.  Its been a few years so I may have forgot what I carried.  I recall visiting a museum for a day in Munich and leaving the bike outside in a visible area.  Unlocked.  Bags and bike were still there when I returned.   "

2) lightweight cable lock.
This can be a nice compromise position... I had an eye-opening experience with this, though.  One of my students (I'm a high school teacher) offered to show me a magic trick.  He took my cable lock (as a bicycle commuter I park my bike in my classroom) and in less than a minute had it opened up.
"How did you learn how to do that?" I asked. 
"YouTube."  came the reply.
So I googled "bicycle combination locks" and the first item was an instructional video on how to crack the combinations.  So if you go the combination lock way, be careful to get a more serious combination.

I was relieved when an old thread got reactivated today on the website to see another description of that same day in Munich that had concerned me.. it seems that the bike really wasn't unlocked, after all.
 "    Re:   Bicycle Security
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2004, 09:55:51 pm » Quote 
Back in 1992 I toured loaded in Europe.  One day I parked my fully loaded bike, with panniers, in front of a museum in Munich, Germany.  I used my cable lock.  I spent several hours inside.  The bike and bags were just fine when I returned. "

3) maximum security.
This can include a Kryptonite style U-Lock and cable or a variety of hardened chain locks.  This is the direction I've headed into over the years.  While no lock will stop a determined thief, it can lead a thief to move on to the less secured bike on the next rack.  My goal is to never be the "least secure/most expensive" bike in any situation.

Those of us who ride in cities are accustomed to these kinds of systems.  If you'd like a humorous and informative look at how to secure a bike here's a short video worth watching.

General Discussion / Re: Mistakes and Attitude while on the road.
« on: April 05, 2011, 05:55:04 am »
Reading the discussion on this thread so far puts me in mind of the old saying, 'there's two kinds of people in the world: people who think there are two kinds of people in the world, and people who don't."

This thread taps into a basic philosophical question that pops up frequently on these forums, and frequent visitors tend to learn which sides regular contributors come in on. 

When I started to get into long distance touring I did reading, on-line research, and signed up for the Adventure Cycling Introduction to Road Touring class.  (Thanks Wally!!!)  For me, all that preparation was fun, not work, and helped me enjoy the experience more.  A friend of mine who'd toured cross country with a knapsack was baffled at my preparation, because her style was much more get on the bike and go. 

For some people an Adventure Cycling class will help maximize fun, for others, even following the Adventure Cycling route maps is losing the spirit of adventure.  Fortunately, there's plenty of roads and trails for all of us.

As for attitude while on the road, one thing that I've noticed is that 'problems' while touring are often lead-ins to the highlight of the day, so much so that I sometimes sing to myself the song from The Producers: "Where did we go right"  about how the most bungled situation can turn into a golden opportunity.

Planners and non-planners all have one big thing in common: our love for travelling by bicycle.

General Discussion / Re: Bike locks
« on: April 05, 2011, 05:34:28 am »
My personality tends in the direction of minimizing risk.  For example, I've never believed the advice that the stock market was a secure place for retirement savings...   ;)

Despite that, before last summer I toured with a lightweight combination cable lock, and tended not to worry. For me, a lot depends upon where I'm planning to ride.

But last summer, during a month of mixed urban/rural touring in Europe, I switched to my usual urban setup of a U-lock with a cable to wrap around front wheel.  On impulse I added a lightweight cable designed to keep my quick release seat attached.  (Akita Seat Leash Cable Lock, 3 oz,  - $4 at REI)

This setup felt completely secure until I hit Amsterdam, where even the oldest, rustiest one speed bikes had locks much more secure than mine.  At that point I visited a local bike shop and added a key-lock chain that gave me more attachment options than my U-lock.

General Discussion / Re: Luxuries
« on: February 26, 2011, 09:36:23 am »
"Coffee!  ...  what are the (lightweight) alternatives?  "

For a semi-coffee caffeine fix, both GU and Cliff Shots make caffeinated espresso energy shots.  One of those while I'm breaking camp gets me to a cafe for some real coffee with second breakfast.

For a real coffee experience, the little Starbucks "VIA" instant coffee packets are surprisingly good... a three-pack weighs 0.35 oz, and grocery stores are starting to carry them.  Pricey, but not like any other instant coffee I've tried.

Gear Talk / Re: Long Two-Person Trip Tent
« on: February 20, 2011, 09:13:49 am »
Based on MrBent's suggestion my wife and I went out to our locally owned outdoor store yesterday and set up the Big Agnes Copper Dome 3.

Our immediate reaction was "wow" ---- what a nice tent.  Easy to set up, freaky light weight, two doors, easy sit up height.

We're in the market for a bigger tent because after about 10 years of solo touring my wife is ready to join in for a self-contained tour, and my little MSR Zoid 2 is really a one-person tent.  The amazing thing to me was that the Copper Spur weighs the same as my oversize bivvy Zoid.

Now for the price: $499 list.  Amazon has it at 20% off, and our local store had a 20% off Presidents Day sale coupon, so I'd look for paying about $400.  You'll have to look at your finances and how long you plan to use it--- but for us it was definitely worth it.

Thanks for the tip, MrBent!

GPS Discussion / Re: GPS: Ready To Go Cross-Country
« on: February 20, 2011, 09:00:35 am »
I used a GPS for the first time on a tour through the Netherlands and Germany last summer and was very happy I had it.

My original reason for the purchase was to help avoid getting lost on the bike, and it did help a lot in that area.  What I didn't expect was how useful it would be in finding food and lodging, atm's etc.  Also, when I was walking around in towns and cities I could store the location of my lodging, and then go out on a totally random walk, following whatever alley or canal looked inviting, with no worries about finding my way back.  One odd side benefit in cities was that instead of screaming out "TOURIST" by unfolding a map at an intersection, my handheld GPS looked more like I was just checking for text messages.

I bought a Garmin GPSmap60cxs based partially on the great advice on the GPS forum here, adding the Garmin "City Navigator" series maps.  (which do include a lot of country roads and lanes--- but not all!)  If I were buying today, I'd get the Garmin GPSmap 62s.

Since returning from my tour last year I've gotten interested in geocaching, but that's another whole world.

Gear Talk / Re: Handlebar bag
« on: February 13, 2011, 04:25:53 pm »
I agree with EnduroDoug on the Arkel sizes...
the smaller Arkel carries everything I take off the bike...
wallet, camera, cellphone, gps, sunglasses, journal, etc.

I actually find that I can tuck the gps into the map case
on top of my map as long as I float it on a kerchief so
it  doesn't slide.

I pull the shoulder strap down and through the two
mounts... that way I can pop it off the bike and
have it over my shoulder in less time than it
takes to lock up my bike.

Water has never been an issue for me with the Arkel.
I keep the bright yellow rain cover tucked into the
front zipper pouch, but it has to be a real steady
heavy rain for me to feel a need to pull it out use it...
the clear plastic map case on top plus the
overall design handles most rain showers.

I bought an extra pair of mounts so I can move
the bag between my summer and winter bikes,
the metal on metal secure connection is solid.

Routes / Re: Anacortes Hotels
« on: February 05, 2011, 09:14:23 am »
When I was starting east on the Northern Tier I stayed at the  Cap Sante Inn, what I remember mostly was that each room had its door directly to the outside so it was easy to roll my bike in and out.  Enjoy Washington State Route 20!

Gear Talk / Rohloff- two questions
« on: February 02, 2011, 07:30:29 pm »
I'm having a new frame custom built and considering Rohloff...

1) I'd be curious to hear from anybody who has actually toured with one what their experience was, especially just how noisy they can be in use.

2) I'm not very mechanically literate... but if I understand the system, to get a lower 'granny gear' you adjust the size of the front chainring.  I'd love advice from the many mechanically blessed members of the forum on a good front ring for touring for this 58 year old rider who doesn't mind going uphill at 4 mph as long as I can keep pedalling. 

Here's where to get some useful numbers that I don't understand:

Thanks in advance, and I hope people have good daydreams going about 2011 tours!

General Discussion / Re: camera choice
« on: January 22, 2011, 12:50:10 pm »
I thought I needed an ultra-zoom until I got spoiled by a little weatherproof Canon Powershot D10...

It lives in my handlebar bag in a micro stuff sack, when walking around fits in a pocket, no worries about water or cold (on a recent Death Valley winter trip when other digital cameras were balking at the cold my camera was shooting away.

For bike touring I'd always wanted a camera that ran on AA batteries to be  independent of a charger, but I've found that the tiny lithium rechargeable in this works amazingly well, I carry an extra battery and when I'm in a hotel/motel charge both batteries up.

This is a camera that's so easy to pull out and snap that I use it on tour.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8