Author Topic: Chain selection  (Read 3462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline awbikes

Chain selection
« on: February 27, 2012, 07:50:27 am »
Its time to replace the chain on my bike. I know this may be a somewhat subjective issue but which chain should I buy? I would like to go SRAM because I like their connector link. Are they fully compatible with the existing Shimano drive line? Next question is price. I noticed  thru Nashbar  SRAM chains for 9 speeds run from approx. 15.00 for a basic chain to 58.00 for a hollow pin design. There are also chains in between those prices. If it's an issue I,m a light tourer generally 30 LBS of gear on flat terraine, paved. I've also noticed there are other brands out there (BBB and Wipperman) whats the difference. I guess I could stick with Shimano but they have different grades also. How does one choose.

Offline John Nelson

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2012, 08:12:44 am »
Yes, the SRAM chains will work fine with Shimano components. Their three basic models of SRAM 9-speed chains are the 951, the 971 and the 991. I only buy them when they're on sale, and I buy several at a time. Often there is only a small jump in price between the 951 and the 971, but a large jump between the 971 and the 991, so I usually end up with the 971. I have kept track of mileage on each chain over the last 15 chains or so, and I do notice that the more expensive ones last longer, but maybe my sample size isn't large enough to be significant. As long as you check your chains frequently for stretch and replace them often, it probably doesn't make much difference which one you use.

Online DaveB

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2012, 08:24:38 am »
Not addressing your chain question directly but how many miles on your current chain and cassette?  If more than a thousand or so, you are likely to need a new cassette also.  A new chain on an old cassette is a sure recipe for chain skipping on the cogs you use most. 

Offline waynemyer

  • World Traveler
  • *****
  • Posts: 274
  • More PITA than PITA. That's our motto!
Re: Chain selection
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2012, 02:29:00 pm »
Another vote for the 971. I use 7-series SRAM chains on almost all of my bikes and I am very happy with them. My mileage per chain ranges from 700 (nasty winter conditions) to about 3000 in the summer.
waynemyer.com
warmshowers.org  (user:waynemyer)

Offline johnsondasw

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2012, 02:54:25 pm »
I have not found the more expensive chains to last much longer.  For me they're not worth it.  I buy $25 chains.  A chain twice as expensive definitely does not last twice as long.  And I can't tell the difference as far as performance goes, but I'm into just being out there riding and not really into the lightest, most perfect elite gear. 
May the wind be at your back!

Offline awbikes

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2012, 07:14:09 pm »
In answer to DaveB question about mileage; I have 2000 miles on existing chain, I have cleaned it every 500 miles and wipe it down with a rag about every 250 miles. Initially I used an oil based lube then went to wax. The chain gauge shows I'm at .75. I have only been caught in rain twice so overall I think the chain has not seen excessive service.

Offline CyclesafeSr

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #6 on: February 29, 2012, 08:02:44 am »
On a lark I bought a deeply discounted Wippermann 9sX stainless steel chain.  By that I mean it was $60 rather than the $100 it normally retails for.  I used it after a long succession of Sram 971's.

Chain life depends on conditions and subsequent maintenance, so both time and mileage are only vague approximators for useful life.

What I'm finding is that the swank chain is quieter, does not request as frequent lubrication, and is stretching slower than the 971.  Do I save enough on lubrication to make up the diffference in price?  No.  Does it seem to be lasting sufficiently longer than the 971 that I'll save money in buying one 9sX's versus two or hopefully three 971's?  Probably not. 


Offline hem

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #7 on: February 29, 2012, 09:42:51 am »
As far as I can tell the more a chain cost the less it weighs and the more bling but not much difference in the wear characteristics. Weather, dust, and maintenance affects chain life mostly. I once bought a bunch of no-name take off chains from JensonUsa for I believe around $8-9 each and they are lasting as well as any other chain I've used. And I use the Connex master link with them as well.

Online DaveB

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #8 on: February 29, 2012, 10:35:42 am »
In answer to DaveB question about mileage; I have 2000 miles on existing chain, I have cleaned it every 500 miles and wipe it down with a rag about every 250 miles. Initially I used an oil based lube then went to wax. The chain gauge shows I'm at .75. I have only been caught in rain twice so overall I think the chain has not seen excessive service.
If your wear gauge shows 0.75% and is accurate (many are not)  then that's about 12-3/32" for 24 pins where a new chain is 12.00" your chain is indeed worn and a new one is likely to cause skipping on your smaller cogs.  The accepted limit for chain "stretch" is 12-1/16" for 24 pins before cog wear is a problem and, even at that, you may have occasional problems.  Try the new one and see but be ready to buy a new cassette if you have any problems.

Quote
On a lark I bought a deeply discounted Wippermann 9sX stainless steel chain.  By that I mean it was $60 rather than the $100 it normally retails for.  I used it after a long succession of Sram 971's......What I'm finding is that the swank chain is quieter, does not request as frequent lubrication, and is stretching slower than the 971
I've found Wippernamm chains in general, not just the top-tier models, are durable and long lasting.  I've limited experience with SRAM's chains but the several mid-level Wippermanns I've used far outlasted them and are in the same league as Shimano's mid and upper level chains.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 10:37:36 am by DaveB »

Offline hem

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #9 on: February 29, 2012, 01:41:57 pm »
@DaveB I have always used 12 links and not 24. Is there a reason to do 24 versus 12 links. I can measure 12 links with the chain on the bike where it is under tension.
24 links means I have to remove the chain to measure for wear.

I am of the school where I don't clean my chain. I wipe it down after every ride and lube when it "talks" to me.

Offline RussSeaton

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #10 on: February 29, 2012, 01:54:38 pm »
@DaveB I have always used 12 links and not 24. Is there a reason to do 24 versus 12 links. I can measure 12 links with the chain on the bike where it is under tension.
24 links means I have to remove the chain to measure for wear.

I am of the school where I don't clean my chain. I wipe it down after every ride and lube when it "talks" to me.

Believe it or not, I think you two are using the same length to measure chain wear.  12 inches.  24 pins.  12 full links.  Each full link is composed of two half links and two pins.  The two half links have an open yoke on one end and the closed end on the other.  The open yoke has the plates on the outside, the closed end has the inner plates.  But when you add the two halves together, you get the one complete link that is exactly one inch long.  And has two pins.

Offline hem

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #11 on: February 29, 2012, 02:07:24 pm »
My Bad. I don't ever recall thinking in terms of pins versus links. I just remember the nearest pin at or past 12"
Anyway a good read on the subject http://sheldonbrown.com/chains.html
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 02:31:04 pm by hem »

Online DaveB

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2012, 10:08:40 am »
Yep, 12" = 24 half-links which is why I expressed the measurement as being over 24 pins which is 12 full links.  I can also measure this length whith the chain still on the bike.

Offline misterflask

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2012, 04:24:29 am »
Anybody have any experience with KMC chains?  I was about to mount one for a TA trip and hoped it might make the whole trip(always the optimist). 
And John N, how about sharing some of that arduously collected data?  What's your chain life average and the range?

Online DaveB

Re: Chain selection
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2012, 07:42:33 am »
Anybody have any experience with KMC chains?  I was about to mount one for a TA trip and hoped it might make the whole trip(always the optimist). 
I have no personal experience with them but everything I've rad about them is positive.  They work well and their master link seems to be well designed and durable.