cyclesafe
since you don't care about insulting me then i guess constructive discussion is impossible. i have no respect for the emotionally insecure.
western flyer
i've talked to management at grocery stores about this. i'd say nearly all have arrangements with food pantries or soup kitchens. but the fact remains that there is TOO MUCH food for these organizations to handle. that is why i find so much food in grocery store dumpsters. other sources of free food do not have any arrangements, these are the less obvious places like donut shops. honestly, i doubt any charity would want to take the day old donuts or soggy mcdonald's french fries.
i suppose we have different takes on nutrition. i favor fatty foods, the fattier the better. but i'm as skinny as a matchstick doll. i have next to zero fat reserves so i need to constantly replenish them or risk starving to death. i don't want to go on a rant about fatty foods, but i find they fill me up faster and better (i.e. i feel stronger) and fuel me up for longer than a bagel or spaghetti does. everyone's body is different, this is what works for me.
personally, i dislike soup kitchens but i've met people who rely on them. i don't like taking handouts whether its food or money. some may scoff at me making a distinction between scavenging and accepting handouts but to me its crystal clear. when i'm scavenging i'm not in a dependent situation, i'm responsible for my own well being and i leave the possibilities of abundant finds to the gods. it takes the experience of 'trail magic' to the next level.
i once met a gentleman who had been living on his bike for 15 years. he goes from town to town and stays a little while to do some work doing construction or something like that here and there. he was doing quite well for himself, dumpster diving helps stretch his money supply. i don't think he's all that different from someone like hanz stuke who has lived on his bike for more than 30 years. both are technically homeless, and you could say the same about our hunter gatherer ancestors, but they all live rich and fulfilling lives all the same.
i've considered the possibility of doing a ethnography of the lives of traveling types. but what would the purpose of this be? to describe this lifestlye as an exotic curiousity to a squeamish -yet intrigued- middle class? that is what classical anthropology is and i want no part in that. such an ethnography could induce some coercive action to force them into mainstream society! this is what sociology tends to do, aid the powers that be in their quest to control things. no, such a study would be useless to traveling types and could possibly harm them, so i don't think i will do it. but there is the chance it can inspire -if done right- as a narrow glimpse through one person's eyes but it will always be polarizing, for example: "into the wild".
oh and by the way, the hobo rail car of the 21st century is still the rail car.