Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


 

Messages - LouMelini

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
General Discussion / Re: Are you postponing a tour to 2021?
« on: July 20, 2020, 09:21:32 pm »
I agree with hikerjer. I was turned away only in campgrounds without hiker.biker sites. I stayed at 2 hiker/biker sites in Yellowstone and Teton NP. However at Colter Bay in Teton NP, there were 3 vehicles using the hiker/biker campsites when I woke up in the morning. They must have come in after sunset when I was asleep. I have heard this is happening frequently around the country due to increased demand for campsites.

17
General Discussion / Re: Are you postponing a tour to 2021?
« on: July 18, 2020, 06:40:42 pm »
With hikerjer at 71 and staehpji and I at 69 with could start a new topic on old guys and bike touring

18
General Discussion / Re: Are you postponing a tour to 2021?
« on: July 18, 2020, 07:38:46 am »
Are you seeing lots of RVs out there?

RV's are out there, but basic tent sites are being filled up quickly by folks with large Coleman tents. One KOA manager said tent sites was the largest increase in his business.

19
General Discussion / Re: Are you postponing a tour to 2021?
« on: July 17, 2020, 06:17:39 pm »
For Big blue cat: I arrived home yesterday from a West Yellowstone to Salt Lake City tour. Fortunately there are hiker/biker sites in the national parks. Obtaining a campground site on a weekend, and perhaps on a weekday is difficult if not impossible. I hitched a ride to save 2 days in order to arrive home on a Thursday vs. this weekend. Campgrounds are full with reservations and first come/first serve fill up early. I was turned away twice, which is double the number of times I've been turned away in 23,000 miles of touring. I was prepared to stealth camp, but I prefer the relative luxury of campgrounds.

20
General Discussion / Re: Flats while touring
« on: May 21, 2020, 04:36:32 pm »
John: my exact reasoning for using the Schwable Supreme. I use the 35C as I can't find the 32C. I can buy through Quality Bike Parts due to my volunteer position at a non-profit bike shop, but QBP doesn't stock the 32C. That is why Julie rides Continental Gatorskins in the 32C size so that her wheel set-up is a little lighter than mine.  When we did the TransAm with one flat, on a very hot day on a steep descent.

21
General Discussion / Re: Flats while touring
« on: May 20, 2020, 06:53:40 pm »
John Nettles and Froze:  Thanks for the prompt. I procrastinated doing it for too long.

22
General Discussion / Re: Flats while touring
« on: May 20, 2020, 09:23:23 am »
Thanks John;  I've wondered about that when I got a rash of spam email earlier this year.
Lou

23
General Discussion / Re: Flats while touring
« on: May 20, 2020, 08:50:56 am »
1. How many flats: my wife and I have had 4 flats in the last 6,000 miles (12,000 when counting both of our miles)- both of mine occurred in a campground on the gravel road (thorn)
    I use schwable marathon supreme and Julie is on Continental gatorskins.

2. I carry 4 spare tubes for the 2 of use in case we run into a patch of thorns or other road debris.

3. We carry a spare tire, used it on two separate occasions due to a badly cut tire and a broken tire bead

4. We replace, patch at the end of the day

5. Tires seem to do well, no need to use added protection- We carry Park Tool tire boot, used it once .

24
General Discussion / Re: Tire pressure
« on: October 01, 2019, 10:24:57 pm »
I agree with the companions of staehpji. On the TransAmerica last year (Schwable marathon supremes) I ran my tires at 75-80 psi (max 85 psi) I knew when the tire pressure dropped below 65 psi as the bike felt sluggish. I don't subscribe to lower pressure equals lower rolling resistance-it depends.

25
General Discussion / Re: fordstown, ky
« on: May 30, 2019, 02:14:52 pm »
I heard of others having the good fortune of staying in the fire station. My wife and I stayed in the county park last year, a park that we would not recommend to others. Good luck with your travels.

26
Gear Talk / Re: Most compact UL down quilt or sleeping bag?
« on: January 28, 2019, 01:13:07 pm »
I like bags from Western Mountaineering

27
General Discussion / Re: Carrying a spare tire on tour?
« on: January 28, 2019, 01:09:06 pm »
My wife and I have used our spare tire twice in approximately 13,000 miles of touring since 2005. Once was a badly cut tire and the other was a broken wire bead on the tire. We carry a light weight folding tire for that rare need and peace of mind. We also carry tire boots. We have not had to use the spare since 2009 perhaps due to better tire selection at the beginning of our trips. 

28
General Discussion / Re: Statistics on cross country tourers
« on: September 19, 2018, 09:09:01 pm »
At this time no one can say if 200 people ride coast to coast or 2000. Maybe the number is 3000. Currently one can register their ride on the the ACA website, but I don't know what the ACA does with that data. As I envision it, and I could be completely wrong, but a simple email to the members asking "Did you ride coast to coast in the past 5 years"; If so "what year". Did you ride the Northern or Southern Tier, The TransAmerica route, or another route that took you from one ocean to another". From that, a ballpark number of cross country riders could be obtained, not perfect but at least a figure to work with.  From that group further data could be collected such as age, gender, direction of travel or whatever one wants to ask such as "did you intend on riding cross country but were unable to complete the ride". The largest hurdle would be getting people to respond. A small response rate would be disappointing, and probably misleading. With regards to the Appalachian Trail, people seemed excited to register their thru-hike, there was a level of excitement, therefore the AT numbers are fairly credible. One receives a "2000-miler" certificate from the Appalachian trail Conservancy for registering your hike plus a couple of small patches that could be sewn to your backpack.

29
General Discussion / Re: Statistics on cross country tourers
« on: September 18, 2018, 12:48:28 pm »
John: one more statistic and opinion.  There are 11 National scenic hiking trails. These are "protected" trails and I believe receive some funding from the Government as a result of the National Trails System Act of 1968. The Appalachian Trail is one such trail. Wouldn't it be nice if the TransAmerica trail, the oldest Adventure Cycling bike route, could be designated as a "national scenic trail" under the Act of 1968. Statistics and number of users would need to be obtained.

Lou

30
General Discussion / Re: Statistics on cross country tourers
« on: September 18, 2018, 11:38:24 am »
Are you talking about the AT or bicycling?  If bicycling, what number do you believe is way off other than my joking of 1,298,074?  Again, what is your number based on, i.e. JUST the TransAm, ALL cross-country routes (border to border), or ?
If AT, I have no knowledge of that other than to say that I think AT hikers are tougher than TA bikers.  I would not like to go days without a shower. :)


I was referring to the statistics presented in reply #2 regarding the Appalachian Trail.  With regards to the TransAmerica or all cross-country routes, the Adventure Cycling Association could set up some guidelines. For example, on the TransAmerica bike route maps there is a statement that one can "report your ride completion if you rode 90% of the TransAmerica bike route". Or perhaps a "cross-country" ride would be counted if one rode "x" amount of miles across the country, with "x" being and arbitrary number such as 3600 or perhaps 4000.

The several days on the AT without a shower was not to our liking either. And another yes that the AT was more difficult than the TA but that may be in part due to the time difference- 176 days for the AT; 71 days for the TA.

Pages: 1 [2] 3