Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Building Sale Discussion Area / Love is Blind
« Last post by Gordon02 on Today at 07:59:27 am »
Many of us members, I am guessing, are not members because of the value of the membership.   Just as parents do not look at their own newborn child and think "Is this a keeper?", I joined the ACA near the time it took that name because I love bicycling.   What alternative does one have if one values bicycle touring the planet?   This club stands for something important, vital, and it is a part of me as I consider myself a part of it.   I would probably work for it for free.   
2
Building Sale Discussion Area / Re: thoughts, more in sadness
« Last post by Gordon02 on Today at 07:55:40 am »
Yes, the League of American Bicyclists does a lot of advocacy work, but I was alarmed by its total lack of responsiveness, even to hand written letters, in addition to emails. No apparent community at LAB.   This experience of mine was '23-'25.  Respectfully, Peter in Vermont
3
International / Re: International flights with bicycles
« Last post by John Nelson on Today at 12:10:27 am »
I've never flown to Europe with a bicycle, but I have rented a bicycle in Europe several times. It's pretty easy to do, and most big cities have a number of reasonably-priced options. You can usually rent a bike with racks and panniers if you want.

Airline bicycle policies change periodically. It used to be inexpensive, then it got crazy expensive, and it's currently rotated back to inexpensive again. Most airlines have liberal size limits for bicycles (and don't even charge you the oversize fee), but a few still have size restrictions that make it practically impossible to take a bicycle because the maximum size of the luggage (at any price) isn't big enough for anything but a folding bicycle. Also, it is not possible to take a e-bike on any flight on any airline (because of the battery). It's important not to book your flight until you fully explore the airlines bicycle policies. Even then, be sure to make a copy of the policy on the day you book, so that you can show it to the agent when you check in, just in case the agent thinks the policy is something else. I just checked a few airline policies now for flights from the USA to Europe. All of these airlines have generous size limits for bicycle boxes.
  • United Airlines: A bicycle just counts as any other piece of luggage, except that oversize fees are waived. I've taken my bicycle domestically on United many times with no problems. United doesn't even have a way for you to tell them that you're bringing a bicycle, so just show up with it. But pay attention to the difference between "Basic Economy" and "Standard Economy" and be sure to book the one that fits your needs (e.g., Basic Economy does not allow a carry-on).
  • British Airways: A bicycle also just counts as any other piece of luggage, but the oversize fees apply. You have to tell them in advance if you are bringing a bicycle.
  • Icelandair: A bicycle counts as a piece of luggage, plus a hefty "odd-sized item" fee will apply (as much as $210). You must reserve space for your bicycle in advance. Icelandair still tells you to deflate your tires--poppycock! In my opinion, Icelandair's policy rules them out. All the other airlines are better.
  • American Airlines: A bicycle counts as a piece of luggage. Oversize fees are waived, but if you are flying to Madrid, the size restrictions will make flying with a bicycle impossible. If you pack it in a cardboard box, they will make you sign a damage waiver.
To smooth the passage through security, and to avoid overweight fees, it is always advisable to pack only your bicycle in the box. Do not include any of your gear. To avoid overweight fees, I always pack my saddle, pedals, and front rack in my other bag. This gets my box down to 47 pounds (the limit is usually 50 pounds). Weigh your loaded bike box to find out if this is necessary for you. If you put only your bicycle in the box, security will just open the box, look inside, and probably do an explosive residue test. If you cram the box full, they will probably have to unpack it, and they almost certainly won't repack it as well as you did.

You usually have to take your bicycle to an oversize luggage area, so you should arrive at the airport plenty early. I'd recommend three hours for an international flight. It might take some time to navigate the special process.

It used to be that all airlines said you had to deflate your tires. These days, most (but not all) airlines have removed this idiotic rule. There's no chance that your tires will explode as they fear. Even if they tell you to deflate your tires, I would ignore this rule. I might take a little air out so that they are a bit soft, but I would not fully deflate them. Inflated tires offer significant cushioning for your wheels and bike. Keeping air in your tires also simplifies your chores upon arriving, as you don't have to pump them back up.

Try not to use multiple airlines for a single trip. That just complicates matters and increases the risk of damage. In fact, try to book a single, non-stop flight if possible.
4
General Discussion / Re: Selkirk Loop
« Last post by John Nettles on January 19, 2026, 09:19:30 pm »
Can anyone provide feedback on the traffic on The Selkirk Loop? Perhaps more specifically US 95 (northbound). We are planning to do the Loop next August. Starting in Sandpoint ID and going counter-clockwise. Someone mentioned to me a concern over many log trucks and traffic on 95 (primary southbound). Would appreciate any feedback.
Review the Idaho AADT map.  https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/60e217d60b81425fbe5356f73b6ab738 .  Be sure to click on the "Map Layers" tab in the upper right area and select 2024 & 2023.  Then zoom in on the map to where you are going.  Click on a road and it should give you a count.  Be sure to scroll down on the count page to get the monthly count as the summer months are almost always higher than the yearly average.
Tailwinds, John
5
General Discussion / Re: Why Adventure Cycling Is at This Juncture
« Last post by DW on January 19, 2026, 02:28:09 pm »
I just read a post elsewhere on the forums which neatly encapsulates all that is wrong with ACA.

1 The poster quotes one of the countless marketing emails from ACA:

"This Isn't Happening Without You"

2) And they offer their response:

"Then I guess it's not happening because you lost me
(and my substantial estate planning donation) a while ago and have not taken steps get me back.
And I feel the need to write that the shiftiness re: the sale is extremely concerning. 
Really seems like something is rotten in Denmark.  Shame on you."


<<<>>>

"Because you lost me"
And lost 31,999 other members - from 50,000 in 2020 down to 18,000 now.

I have been involved in the bike touring community and have been a member of ACA for 40+ years.
I started hearing comments similar to this 3-4 years ago and they have multiplied.

Quite simply, the leadership at ACA made serious mistakes over the past 3-4 years.
And they have been lockstep in their denial of any responsibility for the organization's massive decline.
The current leadership prides itself on its progressive views,
yet the primary reason offered in the initial vote notification was the "ageing out" of boomer riders.
That was not only ageist, but factually wrong, since 32,000 riders do not age out in 3-4 years.
It was also financially blockheaded since this is the cohort which primarily funds ACA.

I am also flummoxed that the current leadership chose to stonewall the SaveACA group
rather than find some sort of compromise - given the number of past leaders represented.
It appears to many that the decision to define the conflict as "old guard" vs. "new guard"
was made early on by current ACA leadership. Their language indicates as much.
And it was completely unnecessary.

I am not opposed to the sale of the headquarters building, per se.
I have visited ACA's headquarters many times and appreciate its history.
However, the sale of the headquarters will do nothing to change the decline at ACA,
unless there is, first, a serious inventory of past errors and, second, an effective plan for the future.

* This is not posted under "Building Sale" because the issue is far more than the sale of the building.

Well said, Jamawani.  A severe case of organizational myopia layered with an unhealthy dose of avoidism.  As in responsibility.

6
Building Sale Discussion Area / Re: I am voting to sell
« Last post by RonSuchanek on January 19, 2026, 01:46:55 pm »
MDGColorado I appreciate and completely agree with your concise post. 
7
I agree there are many good reasons to let go of the building, communicated to the membership by the current leadership. They also felt lots of pressure to act quickly and prioritized moving over listening.

My disappointment upon opening the email "Your vote is open: Credentials inside.” motivated me to speak up in support of voting 'no' because I thought it was the less heard opinion. I'm vastly more disappointed to learn that the conflict has been escalated to a filed lawsuit and am unlikely to find the motivation to follow through and cast any vote.

Tom,

For over seven months (June 2025-January 2026), the position of the board and ACA was the only one communcated to members.  The board not only acted quickly as you've noted, it acted unilaterally.  That is, in violation of several Montana laws.  All the efforts the Save ACA Committee made to share its case with the full membership were blocked, undermined and sabotaged.  Until the week before the member meeting.  Details throughout the many posts here.

You are correct to speak up with your "No" vote, as other views were not only "less heard", they were not heard at all until around January 8, five days before voting began.

Keep in mind that Mr. Cossitt filed his lawsuit pro se (representing himself as a member) because of the extraordinary efforts ACA made to be the one and only voice the members heard.  Mr. Cossitt's lawsuit was filed for those reasons.

So please go ahead and cast your "No" vote before midnight Mountain Time January 20.

8
I agree there are many good reasons to let go of the building, communicated to the membership by the current leadership. They also felt lots of pressure to act quickly and prioritized moving over listening. I believe the perspective that people who aren't convinced by these reasons need a reality check more than an audience is how we've become entangled in a dispute. Legal action is a way to demand attention and Mr Cossitt is motivated to spend the time to make that happen. Mr Cossitt simultaneously claims independence and shows he's biased (see https://forums.adventurecycling.org/index.php?topic=18519.msg99039#msg99039 and asking the court to award him fees from ACA funds). I'm trying to understand each party.

My disappointment upon opening the email "Your vote is open: Credentials inside.” motivated me to speak up in support of voting 'no' because I thought it was the less heard opinion. I'm vastly more disappointed to learn that the conflict has been escalated to a filed lawsuit and am unlikely to find the motivation to follow through and cast any vote. I hope the case is closed by the time my membership is up for renewal because I want to continue supporting the group that helps long distance cyclists in the USA, not attorneys profiting from our inability to hear each other.
9
General Discussion / Why Adventure Cycling Is at This Juncture
« Last post by jamawani on January 19, 2026, 09:40:56 am »
I just read a post elsewhere on the forums which neatly encapsulates all that is wrong with ACA.

1 The poster quotes one of the countless marketing emails from ACA:

"This Isn't Happening Without You"

2) And they offer their response:

"Then I guess it's not happening because you lost me
(and my substantial estate planning donation) a while ago and have not taken steps get me back.
And I feel the need to write that the shiftiness re: the sale is extremely concerning. 
Really seems like something is rotten in Denmark.  Shame on you."


<<<>>>

"Because you lost me"
And lost 31,999 other members - from 50,000 in 2020 down to 18,000 now.

I have been involved in the bike touring community and have been a member of ACA for 40+ years.
I started hearing comments similar to this 3-4 years ago and they have multiplied.

Quite simply, the leadership at ACA made serious mistakes over the past 3-4 years.
And they have been lockstep in their denial of any responsibility for the organization's massive decline.
The current leadership prides itself on its progressive views,
yet the primary reason offered in the initial vote notification was the "ageing out" of boomer riders.
That was not only ageist, but factually wrong, since 32,000 riders do not age out in 3-4 years.
It was also financially blockheaded since this is the cohort which primarily funds ACA.

I am also flummoxed that the current leadership chose to stonewall the SaveACA group
rather than find some sort of compromise - given the number of past leaders represented.
It appears to many that the decision to define the conflict as "old guard" vs. "new guard"
was made early on by current ACA leadership. Their language indicates as much.
And it was completely unnecessary.

I am not opposed to the sale of the headquarters building, per se.
I have visited ACA's headquarters many times and appreciate its history.
However, the sale of the headquarters will do nothing to change the decline at ACA,
unless there is, first, a serious inventory of past errors and, second, an effective plan for the future.


* This is not posted under "Building Sale" because the issue is far more than the sale of the building.
10
Building Sale Discussion Area / Re: thoughts, more in sadness
« Last post by DW on January 19, 2026, 09:39:51 am »
If I could find an organization that effectively advocated for on-pavement bicycle travel that would fill a notable gap.  Although I'm wondering if we could have separate associations for distinct routes, kind of like the PCT and AT and CDT have for their respective trails.

David,

The League of American Bicyclists (LAB) in DC https://bikeleague.org/ does lots of advocacy work.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10