Hi all...
The couple of times I've toured before, I've used a pair of Ortlieb Back Roller Classic panniers, and it worked fine. I liked the "One big waterproof pocket" idea, so I didn't have to worry much about water getting inside, or of making sure individual items were protected.
I bought a Bruce Gordon touring bike last summer, and am going to use it for the first time quite soon. When I bought the bike, Bruce asked me if I wanted to buy some of the panniers he had commissioned that fit perfectly on his racks. I wanted to give him business, and liked the idea of panniers he designed, so I bought them too (front and rear). Also, when I was buying them, he made an argument for not needing waterproof panniers (he thought it was just fine to put dry sacks in the panniers for anything that needed to be protected - Bruce is famous for being rather opinionated :-) ).
In any case, I have his panniers, and I'd like to use them, so I went out and bought a bunch of different-sized dry bags from REI. I'm sure this system will work fine, but I *am* a bit concerned that it won't be as easy or simple as when I used the Ortliebs.
This is probably a much-debated topic around here, so I hope it's not wrong for me to ask - what do you think of waterproof panniers vs non-waterproof plus internal waterproof bags? Is there a great advantage to one over the other? Several advantages either way? The panniers I bought don't have any external pockets, so I don't get that advantage with them.
I'd also thought of getting some waterproof pannier covers, but some experienced tourers I spoke with told me that when they've tried that, if they went through a significant downpour, water would either eventually seep onto/into the bags anyway, or would get in when they removed the covers, so I took their advice and didn't go that route.
- Tim