Hey, are you trying to pick a fight?
(Just kidding!)
I think my biggest point is that the Volpe, Randonee and Trek 520 are all steel-framed road bikes, as are the Gordon, Americano and Waterford. They all have drop handlebars, better componentry and are pre-set for racks and panniers, rear AND front, which the Trek 7300 does not. Personally, the chromly frame is the biggest reason I would take a Volpe (or Randonee or 520) over anything with an aluminum frame for extended travel.
That being said, my wife rides her 7300 on community rides and the occasional overnight trip. I do use my Trek 4600 MTB for off-road camping trips, and I know lots of people use aluminum for touring. On the road, however, I think steel has a comfort (and repairability) advantage, which brings me back to my real question:
Why pay 3-4 times as much for a bike that would seem to be pretty similar to the Volpe?
In all honesty, I appreciate fine bikes from whatever maker, and I always hope to win the big prize from Adventure Cycling each year. Yes...I would gladly accept that Co-Motion bike and ride it!
Some day I hope to get a chance to try out one (or more) of the high-end bikes, and then I may change my tune. Until then, I am curious. Happy with my Volpe...just curious about the others.
Hans
National Mountain Bike Patrol-MN
www.trailpatrol.org