Kind of off-topic, but I'll bite.
As I understand it, the problem would not have happened if they had stuck to stafety standards that are already in place. I expect that they have probably learned their lesson now, and they know their violation wasn't worth it.
I do drive, but only about a thousand miles a year. I ride bike many times that much. We have people not wanting any drilling in our local hills, and my reaction is, "Then quit driving." There's all this push for more-efficient vehicles too, yet it has been proven that more-efficient ones only make people feel free to drive more miles.
The county of Los Angeles is holding public meetings around the area to address the needs of bicycle transportation. See
http://lacountybikeplan.org/ . I plan to go to the one closest to me, and to be prepared to speak and possibly show pictures if there's a chance. We have quite a few nice bike trails that are truly bike freeways or "bikebahns," not cluttered with strollers and dogs and so on, suitable for any speed you can achieve. (I've done 5 miles in 9 minutes in a great tailwind.) They mostly follow the rivers though, and if the rivers don't go the direction you need to go, then the trails aren't much good. There ought to be at least a trail running along the windward side of every freeway. The land is already there, and spending a little extra on a bike trail would relieve traffic congestion and reduce the cost of maintaining the freeways probably more than enough to pay for itself. What I don't have figured out is how to have the trail cross the on and off ramps, whether by putting the bike traffic through tunnels or over bridges.